View Full Version : SCOT PARKER TO NEWCASTLE!
Hakka
15-06-2005, 05:40 PM
Very happy with this signing!
Just hope get Emre now too!
Hakka
15-06-2005, 05:41 PM
missed a T on scott there...
Richierush
15-06-2005, 06:20 PM
i was a bit gutted we (everton) didnt get him but am sure we can find another good central midfielder
Why the big fuss about him?
piginabush
15-06-2005, 08:40 PM
exactly...... the geordies could sign anyone they wanted but with that useless prick in charge it isnt going to do any good ;)
Traxx
15-06-2005, 10:47 PM
Shows you whet he thinks of your champions league credentials when he still chooses Newcastle. Clever lad :clap:
Frank Dogshit
15-06-2005, 11:16 PM
another souness panic buy.
he'll be gone by christmas.
Hakka
16-06-2005, 07:59 AM
you funny lot!
haha...
lukekendall
16-06-2005, 08:47 AM
yeah he is a good player, i was hoping spurs would land him for compo for the arsen tapping up
Esox Lucius
16-06-2005, 09:30 AM
had a feeling he wouldnt come to us, not a bad move for him.
Seriously i dont see the big fuss with him,newcaslte aren't exactly short on central midfielders and he is well over rated.6.5 million for him and 55k a week? **** that he just aint worth it.
lukekendall
16-06-2005, 12:12 PM
Seriously i dont see the big fuss with him,newcaslte aren't exactly short on central midfielders and he is well over rated.6.5 million for him and 55k a week? **** that he just aint worth it.
55k a week!!!!
is that serious, he should not be getting payed that much
i think he is worth 6.5 mill tho
Aye he is on 55k a week.
He is a good player,a little over rated but still a good player but not what they need.Everyone is under the impression that just coz he is a half decent player that he is a good signing but he isnt at all.
nick_anarchy
16-06-2005, 05:14 PM
whats the big fuss , hes over rated
Hakka
16-06-2005, 08:01 PM
so why was it ok for Chelsea to sign him for £10million and on 55k week and not Newcastle at £6.5 million?
Who said it was?
The difference is Chelsea bought him so he would sit on the bench,newcastle have bought him as one of there top players when other areas needed strengthening.
Hakka
17-06-2005, 12:36 AM
Who said it was?
The difference is Chelsea bought him so he would sit on the bench,newcastle have bought him as one of there top players when other areas needed strengthening.
Batman said it.
lukekendall
17-06-2005, 08:17 AM
still can t get over he is on 55k :shock:
dont think a single spurs player is on over 40 k
an before anyone says that is cause there all shit, na there are a quite a few better than him
piginabush
17-06-2005, 10:01 AM
Who said it was?
The difference is Chelsea bought him so he would sit on the bench,newcastle have bought him as one of there top players when other areas needed strengthening.
like the back 4 and the 2 up front ;)
Not only that they dont have any wingers i mean come on Milner and N'zogbia cant do it can they? N'zogbia is an alright player but better in the middle and Milner is just a lost cause.
He said last season he wanted to add 6 players to his squad,well so far he has sold or is selling Hughes,O'brian,Kluivert,Bellers,Robert and Bowyer and added only Parker so thats another 11 players he has to buy and get them all fitted into the squad.
cough*going down*cough
piginabush
18-06-2005, 06:10 PM
cough*going down*cough
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.