Jack Deville div.

[Jack Deville]

Good night,

Three tracks you can listen to, some floathing sounds.
Hope you'll like it and give me some feedback.


White stone (http://home.casema.nl/seisveld/JackDeville-WhiteStone)
Reason
134 bpm
Size 5.68mb
Length 6.12min.

Left (http://home.casema.nl/seisveld/JackDeville-Left)
Reason
136 bpm
Size 5.6mb
Length 6.07min.

Intro (http://home.casema.nl/seisveld/JackDeville-Intro)
Reason
138 bpm
Size 5.94mb
Length 6.29min.

[BRADLEE]

Holy downloads Batman that was fast. :lol:

Man all of these tracks are pretty damn cool man. A bit more chilled than the style I'm really into, but they all sound really clean for sure.

All of the tunes would be excellent as DJ tools and they are also nice tracks all in all. Maybe a couple of little drum edits here and there and a bit more FX would really make them even better....but that is just my opinion. These tunes are already pretty nice though as is.

Out of the three LEft was mu favorite. :clap:

[Elvio Neto]

nice stuff !

im going to check this later in home.

helcome to the forum.

[Jack Deville]

Thanks guys,

@ Messengar,

I think you're right about the drum edits, i've got to spend more time on them.

@ Elvio Neto,

I'm glad you like it :lol:

I'll give some feedback on the other tracks as soon as possible.

Anyone else some critical notes or tips?

[curly]

Sounds clean and well produced to me, A bit slower than my taste though

[V..]

Nice stuff man, especially if it was produced in reason.
Track one is nice, but sounds a little cloudy in places, and could do with some real good quality eqing to tighten it all up.
This type of techno needs to be hectically clinical production wise to carry it off.
I`d say some of the sounds are just a little too digital and could do with more analog width.

2nd tune is also nice, although the production isn`t as tight here.
There`s something not quite right with the overall dynamics here.
Bass could be deeper, and the kick could have a bit more oomph.
Maybe a bit more definition in the mid range also.
And again, some of the sounds are a little too digital and also a bit dry.
This is probably more to do with the problems of reason as a closed environment.

3rd track is again, pretty good.
The mix in this is the least balanced of these 3 tunes.
The low end feels very thin, and again maybe a bit more depth to the kick, and a touch more volume on the bass would help.
The ride cymbal that comes in, is a little loud.
There`s muddyness in the mid range that could be sorted out with better separation.

Overall, some good tunes here, that could do with better production. Exporting them to something like cubase and finishing them off to a good polish would be the best bet.
Really nicely concieved work though, good deep vibes for a more groovy pallette, and different enough to stand out from a lot of the stuff I hear, so well done.

:clap:

[Mindful]

These sounds nice Ill have a proper listen tonight

[Mindful]

These are realy good mate realy feeling the vibe of these tracks.
Theyve got a nice old sound to them but with a new sounding twist.

Think you should maybe mix these back down again and getbusy with the eq and compression.

Style wise I realy dig these.
Welcome to the board ;)