PDA

View Full Version : What takes more cpu?


RichieV
30-09-2003, 06:02 PM
A vst channel or bouncing it to an audio track?
DJZeMig_L
30-09-2003, 06:45 PM
A VST Channel no doubt...


Z
eyes without a face
30-09-2003, 08:49 PM
yeah a vst deffo.

when working on a track, i often bounce a plugin to audio when ive got it how i want it, then just insert back as a sampler channel, saves the cpu leaving it free for other processing
RichieV
30-09-2003, 10:45 PM
i guess i should be more specific


The vst is a melody that always changes so putting it in a sampler is cubersome because the file is 5 minutes long

Would using the vst take less popwer in this instance? Or would 5 minutes of audio. The vst is a mono synth
Basil Rush
01-10-2003, 02:57 PM
Yeah, you can run 80 tracks of audio on a realatively shit PC, but 80 notes of polyphony let alone 80 actual synths and the thing would be begging to be stuck in the dustbin...
DJZeMig_L
01-10-2003, 03:52 PM
Still audio is better .. in this case the strain will be more on yer HD then on the CPU... but also U should maybe check some of the options on yer soundcard's asio driver.

Z
audioinjection
02-10-2003, 05:07 PM
especially when u get to those grubby plug-ins (waves, tc, etc.) they take up alot of cpu also.

thats why i use dsp cards ;)
RichieV
03-10-2003, 07:09 AM
problem solved ,

i bought a dual amd board and chips yesterday
DJZeMig_L
03-10-2003, 01:47 PM
lol :)

Z
acidhead
03-10-2003, 02:09 PM
thats why i use dsp cards

i have always wondered about spending money on the cpu cards - what do u use ?

i was thinking about the creamware xtc for doing that as it also works as a synth when i need it

are the fx on the cards out of the software fx's league or are they similar sounding ?

i have never hit a full cpu load yet on my pc but wanted a better quality reverb to the one onboard my digidesk / software , is the £1000 quid spent well on a card or is it better to buy a nice tc rack u think?
DJZeMig_L
03-10-2003, 06:59 PM
I wish Waves did a Power DSP card!! :)

I really don't dig TC all that much I find I use 90% waves Plug- ins!

Z
Jimfish
03-10-2003, 07:12 PM
i use the tc for the reverb and the graphic... the waves is 'better' but i just prefer the tc for some reason.. it makes me feel safe and secure.

maybe there was a tc reverb in my mummies womb
Jimfish
03-10-2003, 07:13 PM
or am i thinking of the echo inside fernando's mum?
RichieV
05-10-2003, 05:33 AM
i have the UAD card


I think it is worth it just for the sounds!
I just bought a second one for 300 US
Jimfish
05-10-2003, 10:38 AM
really ???? $300 **** thats good... where from??
RichieV
05-10-2003, 11:27 AM
ebay
Jimfish
05-10-2003, 12:29 PM
i fooookin love ebay
audioinjection
06-10-2003, 06:43 PM
I have the mackie uad card, it's freakin great!

but cost me $700 :shock:
DJZeMig_L
06-10-2003, 07:56 PM
I wish they had a Firewire version :(


Z
audioinjection
06-10-2003, 07:59 PM
tc electronics has the firewire power core, they're really good sounding plugins. I"m thinking of getting those soon also.
DJZeMig_L
06-10-2003, 08:41 PM
TC doesn't have my heart !! but I do agree that it's good!!

Z
Jimfish
06-10-2003, 08:53 PM
so u a fan of that uad1 then ZM?

wots the reverb like on that puppy?
DJZeMig_L
07-10-2003, 11:28 PM
guess that would by more down my alley!!

reverb sound b sweeeeet ;)
(also on the TC 4 sure!!!!!).
Z
audioinjection
08-10-2003, 04:15 PM
uad pultec eq and compressor are great!

has anyone got their hands on the Sony Oxford eq's??? I've heard they kick ass.
DJZeMig_L
08-10-2003, 04:38 PM
they do... but u need a UAD card 4 that... that's one of the reasons I crave them :)

Z
278d7e64a374de26f==