****s over any other package i've ever used.
and a snip at £1500
no more logic or cubase for me,
but thank heaven for NFR versions or i'd be screwed.
Printable View
****s over any other package i've ever used.
and a snip at £1500
no more logic or cubase for me,
but thank heaven for NFR versions or i'd be screwed.
no one answers this...
hmmmmmm
no one using it?
ah well, maybe its a bit PRO for ypu
tee hee :lol: :lol: :lol:
there is no holy grail of sequencers
The best results come from any tool you use, that you know inside out, and have experience on.
Having said that, I`ve heard good things about nuendo
All i've ever heard bout stienbergs products is good word. That's not sayin much though from me.
But i guess Stienberg is the Microsoft for music.
one of my mates uses nuendo tony, he swears by it, as an SX user im totally confused about the differences between them.
Care to pass comment tony? why nuendo and not sx? what stands out?
From what i been picking up, Nuendo is more suited for Video production but also is good for audio production.
If u dont know wich one to use ... buy the more expensive product....
belive me nuendo doesnt have 4 times the price of cubase just because
of video production ... u can work with video in cubase too [not to the same extent ]..
nuendo is more optimized , and has better sound quality .. therefor ...more expensive :crackup:
wrongQuote:
Originally Posted by Xavi
sx and nuendo use the exact same audio engine