http://translate.google.com/translat...04022wp%2Ehtml
for anybody thats interested
Printable View
http://translate.google.com/translat...04022wp%2Ehtml
for anybody thats interested
Very interesting.
I worked for years in a purely analog studio.
Sequencing, recording the lot was analog.
And I never though computer based stuff could come close.
Until I started using it.
In some of these comparisons, I actually thought the soft versions sounded more analog than the originals.
the exception being the audiorealism versus the real 303, which no one has yet matched.
A few years ago, a mate and i were saying how good it would be if you could get ,say a 'Jupiter 8', and other old analog kit onto a single PCI card !!!!!
Little did we know
The odd thing baout htose tests, is that the soft synths that came off worst.
Were rolands emulations of their own machines!!!!
Doesn`t surprise me though, roland has been a woefully random and out of touch company for a long time.
yeah odd that, and slightly embarrassing.
I ****in love the sound of the poly6 tho, used to have a real one many years ago :cry:
yeah, me too.
and a poly 800
I wish they'd have done the mono/poly instead.. i got one and man do i love that synth, its a monster.
Poly 800 was my first synth. bought it along with a Yamaha RX21 drum machine(Oh those realistic drum sounds)!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by dirty_bass
And yeah Dodgy, a monopoly vst would be creamy chocolate.
Those korgs had a sound unto themselves