Probably have to do something with the mid percussion sounds and that bleep (which are manipulated hi hits). Im looking for pointers on this if you have any. Hope you like
http://www.thedivide.co.uk/audio/47.9_02MA.mp3
Printable View
Probably have to do something with the mid percussion sounds and that bleep (which are manipulated hi hits). Im looking for pointers on this if you have any. Hope you like
http://www.thedivide.co.uk/audio/47.9_02MA.mp3
track sounds phat dude, i cant hear any immediate problems, but for my taste i'd like to hear some snap in that kick, other than that, its all good, nice job
I'd have to agree with David Dan. Man really love this one homie. Has that very old school but also up to date sound mate. Can for sure tell it's your style as well like always. Always a fan homie.Quote:
Originally Posted by audioinjection
Cheers man, this should sound better...
http://www.thedivide.co.uk/audio/47.9%2003MA.mp3
Ok maybe take out those blippity bleeps and some raw percussion
happy with synths and what not tho, mix seems full
its sounds quite good from this end danny..
personally i'd have it a touch faster and im not into the open hat patterns that are going on..
also liked the vocal on the first mix.. first mix in general i found had more energy. 2nd one, although cleaned up seems to have lost a bit of the "grit"
I quite like the bleepy bit...
sounds fat mate, and wonky as ****!! love all the sounds in there, don't change a thing!!
The only thing not to my taste really is the 4/4 rhythms, i think it'd sound a lot more dynamic with a more 'broken' kick rhythm..
loads of details in the dude, just what i like :)
Just listening to 2nd version and it sounds proper, imo. Nice track with interesting breaks and FXs, I like..
QUALITY!