Printable View
Just i looking on stay up forever site and hydraulix 13 series have it listed as a seperate label, is that true ?
I thought hydraulix 13 series is one of part hydraulix label and shouldnt been separated like a new label.
What you think guys ?
here is link:
http://www.truelove.co.uk/catalog_ma...HYDRAULIX%2013
Also someone on discogs divided hydraulix label on two parts:
normal hydraulix releases + hydraulix 13 series and im not sure is that correct one.
Confused .... :10:
I believe the 13 series is reserved for remixes and so it would make sense for the titles to be kept separate from the rest, just like the Smitten and SUF remixes are. Any more thoughts?
Unlucky 13 maybe? Who know's, maybe Henry thought he'd get past the unlucky one by making it 13 point something...
Maybe its unlucky number, maybe not, but if we getting another label/sublabel it must have something what is different from original, mother label i think.
Of course it could be >> "All Remixes will be there"
Most "13" releases are remixes isnt ?
So question is: its still Hydraulix record and all "13" its no separate part of Hydraulix or we got one of Hydraulix sub-label like a Stay Up Forever Remixes for Stay Up Forever and we can make new one cataloge for that label.
I think it should be like it was.
Just like with the Smitten.
When you type Hydraulix in serch engine on discogs you will have all of them and the difference is between cat. #...just like with all Smittens.
Agreed with you Peter, have same opinion like you mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by 113
Not sure this guy from discogs have right or not, im still confused.
Would be nice to know what the others thinking about that then.
un
lu
ck
y
fo
r
so
me....
Thought so! :)
Th1rt3en.