Stop f*cking around Net.............
Printable View
Stop f*cking around Net.............
right guys knock this on the head. networker - stop being a twat please.
what is a LOOSER anyway roland?
hey easy with the insults m8Quote:
Originally Posted by MARK EG
banned.
rowland can you start the topic again mate. cheers.
i think we all know now that networker was in fact mike humphries pulling our plonkers. hahahaha.
well i fell for it anyway
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :oops: :oops: :oops: :lol:
does that make it alright does it? now its mike humphries every things lardy ****ing da. see you around
I'm with the Bastard on this one...
well the reason he got under my skin and eventually got banned was after a few comments he directed towards me that, if I'd have know was Mike, would not have got under my skin like that. you can see now that he was winding me up. as for him winding you up, well ok he did do, and i suppose if this was any other member us mods would have pointed them towards the rules and if they didn't quit it they'd get a warning.
to be honest i reacted well OTT today, I don't normally just ban ppl outright but a few of the comments directed towards me and especially one of them after i'd pm'ed him that really, really got to me. now i see who really is behind those posts @ me, I personally have not an issue at all.
the only issue is if rules are broken and to be honest Mike has come a bit too close to the mark. but then again so have you with some of the replys.
just the wipe the slate clean eh. let's just get on with it. any probls pm me, we don't need to drag this out here ;)
dont mean to butt in here, but i didnt find it funny tbh, not my idea of a wind up
i totally see the issue here. but come, please leave this now guys, it's taken up my whole day and i really have got a massive headache with it all. plus some idiots just emailing me trying to get solicitors onto me for something said on the board. let's leave it eh. i'll have a word with mike.
you know what i really dont know what to say im gob smacked, mike humphries made a blatent personal attack and didnt have the balls to do it in his own name, that makes him a pussy mate how you want to sugar coat it i am fuming! he has blatently made a comment which was meant to put me down because i right acid techno, i mean its obvious now why he said k, he is putting me in a catagary of people that go to squat parties and like to get ****ed up beyond control which isnt me and i find that offensive, its just another typical state of mind that a techno purist thinking he is better than me its just like glen wilson refusing to put rowland the bastard on prruk040 because he thought there's some stigma to it, apart from i know glenn and have never met humphries, the ironick thing is mike humphries used to make acid techno under the name dom along with jon nuccles. you do what you want but im not pming you i want people to see the favoritism going on, just beacuse he is a producer /dj.
dont both replying mark im not interested and wont be on here in the near future out of protest, and to think i felt really bad thinking he got band.
this is bullshit.
Eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by MARK EG
F*ckin'ell Mark - perhaps you ought have some disclaimer somewhere.
I have, don't worry it's all cool - just a bit of a headache for me that's all.Quote:
Originally Posted by TechMouse
tell him to watch his ****ing back when you have a wordQuote:
Originally Posted by MARK EG
please rowland, don't have a go at me. i havent got a phd in how to run a forum. i didn't re-instate him cause he is a producer. i re-instated him because i felt so shit for over-reacting and banning him for the reasons i did. first of all he made a comment about me being his bum chum. i totally went off on one and if you look back at that post, it's so funny cause he actually was mike. then i came on here. i saw the comments about k. i got straight onto sam on msn and said 'we've gotta watch that networker'. sam told me he already was. i said, look just ban ppl if they're blatently not what these forums are about. already i was winding myself up. then i pm'ed networker asking him nicely to calm it down and sort himself out. i posted the message 'stop being a twat'. then straight away i got a message saying 'easy'. well that was the final straw. i'm not having someone i don't know wind me up like that. next thing you know, i discovered it was mike. and all became clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowland The Bastard
so i thought about it and thought well would i have banned him if i knew it was mike? and the answer was no. but i certainly would have kept my eye on him and pm'ed him again. with comments like what were said to you, i'd be stupid not to keep my eye on him.
so he's back on board now, and rest assured that rule breaking comments will not be tolerated. i think the best thing is to issue a warning in this case, because i simply wouldnt have just banned someone like this in normal circumstances. that's only fair and i totally see ppl's point.
dont care typical nothern techno attitude
F*cking hell mark, I no its with in you're interest to keep as many people involved in the scene on this forum. But that attitude ****ing sux.
I no for a fact if I had directed anything like that at someone doing something constructive on here I would have been banned.
You could all hold hands and pretend everything's ok but it doesn't work like that in the real world does it?
It's shit like this that puts me of the scene, and has contributed toward getting more and more ****ed of with it as the days go on.
no come on, i really wouldn't have banned him for that. i've been trying to just give out warnings here recently, that's why I had the system installed. i definitely would have given out a warning though after that last 'easy' comment though. he was warned on the post and then even after a pm argued. definitely. that sort of shit is not allowed on here. i try to be as fair as possible here but a warning would definitely have been given in this case.