Touche.Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyBlack
Printable View
Touche.Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyBlack
figured.Quote:
Originally Posted by massplanck
you wont be hearing very much after i stick my tiny penis in your ear and drill your wannabe coulchie brains out the other saide..Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyBlack
.. in a non-gay way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythmtech
That should make April 19th even more fun!
you comin down to it?
should be a rockin night!!
Damn right man, I'm gonna be reviewing it too i think, so loads of mad pictures and obscure questions! :lol: Session on?Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythmtech
I did a WAV vs 320kbit thing here once. Can't remember if anyone bit. Did it on another board with bits from "Hotel California" as the test, since it wasn't a techno board. All the people who absolutely knew they'd be able to spot a difference were, after requesting I waste the time putting loops together, amazingly silent once that had occurred.Quote:
Originally Posted by massplanck
Either way, it's probably Radiohead's fault. ;)
possibly.. i might be fecked though.. ill be flyin in from berlin that mornin after seeing dj godfather & sven vath!!! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyBlack
i could be a little incoherant!
I'm sure we can source something that'll kick some life into ya!Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythmtech
do it again! pleaseQuote:
Originally Posted by tocsin
I'll have to reupload tonight. I'll post a link when it's done.
haha, ah well, i didn't hear a MASSIVE difference. i think if the music had more highs on it i would have been able to tell instantly. all i heard was some frequencies were getting masked...no wonder i could never master my tracks heh! another thing, it didn't ruin my listening experience. i can admire a picture of art from afar i don't need to be super close to see it. (what the **** am i on abooot...)
be interesting to try the 320 vs flac or wav test, reckon massplacnk is gonna fail ;)
i found the difference on this test much more audible
http://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedai...istinguish.php
test via doa
Quote:
Done something similar for a module for uni, so I'll quickly whack it up here.
I ripped a track from a CD (in this case, Fanu - Salam from Daylightless) into a wav, then exported 5 second-sections at different bitrates. On the clip I've done, there is;
5 seconds of Wav 44k/16bit
5 seconds of 320 mp3
5 seconds of 192 mp3
5 seconds of 128mp3
Not in that order. See if you can work out which is which
For the record, I done this for a number of different songs in different genres and eras. My own take is that mixdown/mastering can make a massive difference to the quality of the Encoded MP3. There are, in my opinion, too many variables involved to make any sweeping statements.
File located here. http://files.filefront.com/FanuTest...;/fileinfo.html
Have fun!
EDIT - 16bit, not 24 bit
what was radiohead's fault?Quote:
Originally Posted by tocsin
maybe your efforts were met with silence because people find you generally very tedious and lacking in charisma.
tbf, someone who spends their spare time putting loops together to play on an internet forum is more than likely a cockless wonder with no social life.
i sent a pm to the guy with my answers and got it 100%!! i asked him what results he got from uni
come on then, any of you ****s gonna match me?? post up your answers and i'll post up the correct ones after a bit.Quote:
Wotcha mate,
You got it spot on. From the group at uni, only a few could pinpot exactly what bitrate, about most could tell there was a change in quality, a few couldn't tell any difference at all.
We found that some tunes translated nicely to 192k, some of them sounded awful, so mixdown and mastering probably plays a part in it. Different encoders brought different results too, so there's alot that can affect quality.
Nice one for getting it 100% right though. Clearly got the golden ears!
Quote:
Originally Posted by detfella
where are the files. thats a link to some kiddie games site by the looks of things. Doesnt work right. Just brings me to filefront.com
@microdot.
Let it go. 2 months ago we had a bit of barney and your still up for it for some reason.
there's a download link on the filefront pageQuote:
Originally Posted by massplanck
Im not seeing it danny. it just goes straight to filefront.com mainpage. :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by detfella