well we must be if you say we are
Printable View
well we must be if you say we are
right then *mark stamps his foot like a big girl*
let's get back on track!
:lol:
Honestly, I'me very much lost, Mark. Seriously, if I've somehow missed something, fill me in.
This is horrendous.
We get the good ones and then lose them to people who have not half of the experience points. :evil:
Labels never really coined it in I don't think. Unless were talking mainstream music, which is totally out of context. Mirsha had a point as for the likes of Britney Spears and all that bull.
Personally I think this idea is a half baked act of desperation for PPL. Im not 100% what the PPL is, but im guessing that its similar than the MCPS. The MCPS is a waste of money imo, I signed up and got really confused by it all. All i know is for the fee i paid all i got was confused and some lousy letters from them telling me how many millions they were loosing in revenue. That revenue should have reached the artists which in techno I think would be peanuts anyways. Plus the label I was on at the time sorted all that out anyways but I think the problem was I never really liked the idea in the first place. My loss I guess
I do think some of the superstar dj's coined it in bigtime. I have said this all along. The ones that get my respect do a good job and actually support the scene without trying to milk it. Thats all I got to say really. Im guessing this may not work but schemes similar to this will follow
:lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by TechMouse
What makes me laugh out loud is the comment "even those note lawfully aqquired" This effectively gives a license to people who hold a license to illegally download and feel all smug that they have a 'license' to do it. In reality 200quid vs 20,000 downloads equals 1p per tune. how much of that will the artists see? less than that in a percentage for sure...
IF they manage to get anything at all.
Boo Hiss, very poor showing PPL!