if a person downloading illegal mp3s is not making any money on them, i dont see a problem with it at all.
Printable View
if a person downloading illegal mp3s is not making any money on them, i dont see a problem with it at all.
Yeah, but if many people couldn't download illegal mp3s (especially DJs), they'd be forced to buy mp3s or go into a record shop, like most other real DJs have done for years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Miromiric
Granted there's stuff downloaded that the user wouldn't probably buy if they had to, the fact is that people should have to pay for something, surely? Oh no, if they don't make a profit *themselves* then it's ok? :eh: .
yep its ok in my book not to buy if u dont earn any money on it.
hmm not sure if he would stand by that statement now....Quote:
Originally Posted by danielmarshall
recently a friend lent me a an mp3 player with 30gigs on it. I copied every single beatles, led zep, pink floyd, bob dylan, oasis albums and a load of other stuff. now to me this is the same thing as nicking from microsoft, these people can blatantly afford it. however there's no way I would have sat down and taped it all onto cassette five years ago, so things have changed. As far as mixes go on the internet, thats fair game I reckon, I've bought all that music and am not charging for it.........
ok but what is it, if ppl cut out trax off the set, remaster it and make it on a record for their personal use/djing?? that'd be an idea for someone i think..
of course i'm talkin bout unreleased stuff
that equals to forced penetration.