wouldnt say no, although he is a cock with a huge ego.
Printable View
wouldnt say no, although he is a cock with a huge ego.
you really are clueless son.Quote:
Originally Posted by phantomdj
Fergie did want to sign gerrard, 2 or 3 years ago. haven't heard him mention the g word since gerrard agreed to go to chelsea.
on current form, Anderson and Hargreaves are both better players.
and Scholes always has been better than gerrard.
like I said, Mascherano is the best midfielder at loonypool.
disagree.Quote:
Originally Posted by french_og
he wouldn't be an automatic first choice at any of the other big 3 clubs anymore.
granted, he would get the team a few extra fee kicks and pens in a season, what with his diving and playacting, but I'm not sure that's enough to hold down a spot in the first team for any amount of time.
I'm sure he'll regain his form at some point, his last game for ht e sc***ers was a good one, but I reckon players such as Fabregas and Anderson (not comparing the two) have more natural and technical ability.
how you can talk about divers when your team is full of them is beyond me...
scholes better than gerrard?? pftttttttt!!!!!
That free-kick he scored last week was top draw no doubt about that...
Fabregas and Gerrard would be a mean midfield...
name them then son.Quote:
Originally Posted by phantomdj
if you're referring to Ronaldo then I'd say that, of the two players in the past season or two, gerrard has cheated and dived more.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-hXYn2pA0
if you're referring to Rooney, I've only actually ever seen him dive once. but because it was in a big game against arsenal, we never hear the last of it.
Saha is probably the worst player at Utd for diving tbh, can't remember any major dives though apart from the one where he actually got fouled and made a meal of it this season vs the rent boys.
can you name anyone else that dives at Utd?
Evra? Hargreaves? Rio? Wesley? - Park?, Vidic?
you seem to be constantly sniping at Man Utd and but never actually coming up with any concrete facts to back up what you say.
and if you think gerrard is a better player than Paul Scholes, then you need to introduce me to your dealer cause the gear you're smoking must be some powerful shit.....
both as a player and as a person, stevie g aint fit to lace Paul Scholes' boots.
I'm sure there are many topics about which you really know your stuff.........
football's not one of them.
lets just see what happens December 16th, then we will all see which midfield is stronger.......the only reason you are saying scholes, anderson and hargreaves are better than gerrard is because hes having an off spell at the moment. When gerrard is in top form only scholes comes close, because he really is an excellent player
not seen enough of Anderson to tell if he'll keep it up, but he's put a couple of performances in so far this season that suggest he's every bit as good a player as gerrard, and a better passer of the ball for certain.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacehopper
I'm not denying gerrard is a quality player, at one point he even looked like he might make a world class box to box midfielder, but it just never seemed to materialize.
I just said on current form I'd pick Hargreaves in preference to gerrard for various reasons, which I would and I bet steve mclaren wishes he had/could have done for the last 3 or 4 england games too.
for the record, I also said Mascherano is better than gerrard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insomnia
Fabregas and Essien would make a much better one though.
[/QUOTE]for the record, I also said Mascherano is better than gerrard.[/QUOTE]
different types of players........are you saying mascherano is a better attacking midfielder than gerrard?
I reckon he's got more to his game than gerrard.
Mascherano is just a out and out holding defensive midfielder, does the job well in front of the back for. If Gerrard wanted to just do that role then im sure he could but Gerrard does everything in that midfield. He is not just a good attacking midfielder who gets forward and scores goals but also does get box to box and win a lot of ball also and a all round quality player.
Disapointed with his recent England displays but his performances for Liverpool apart from a blip in form early in the season have been as concistent as any player in the Premiership.
I reckon its gerrard's inability to play the holding role in midfield that prevents him from becoming one of the best in the world.
at one point I thought he could be a world class box to box midfielder, but the defensive side of his game never really improved enough., a few years back,
Mascherano keeps his passing more simple, and as a result more effective, than gerrard too. gerrard looks for the defence splitting pass too much imo.
lmao...
Anderson better than gerrard.
Hargreaves better than gerrard.
Scholes i would say there both the same really but id give gerrard the nod as hes younger.
U mancs mate crack me up mate...
I hope you get beat tonight mate... i really do.. you best get use to the league table how it looks today coz your gonna be stuck below us after the 16th mate, and our game in hand won.
gerrard a diver... coming from the team with ronaldo, evra, saha and rooney who managed to dive when commiting a foul against a russia which near enough cost us the game.
come on fulham!!!
Manchester United fans are like rats your never 3 metres away from one...
Torres gonna whip your skinny asses on 16th boys... Masch in the middle crunchin hargreaves... haha.. oh yer!!
fcuk me, a sc***er hoping Utd get beat at football. wonders never cease.Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ RE:HAB
you should know son, rats being the staple diet of most hub cap collectors....Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ RE:HAB
hahaha...
cheeky ****.
One ting about scholesy mate, everytime he goes for a tackle he gets booked...
Probs lets his game down.
Plus he's ginger...
:lol: is rightQuote:
Originally Posted by Microdot