Hahah gotta love that. Thats a sinking ship if there ever was one. Sooner it goes under the better.
Hahah gotta love that. Thats a sinking ship if there ever was one. Sooner it goes under the better.
ies easier with 4 hard teams rather than 3 because there is more chance of others slipping up against the other side. with one whipping team there is no real advantage to the 3 good teams... so either have 3 easy teams like you did, or have 4 hard ones.. liverpools group was not easy because had we not beaten betis, the group would look different
Betis aren't much if any better than Ajax. Anyway, yes French og they won't be signing Ballack so stop going on about him! How about Souness as player manager? ;)
Nearly forgot, saw a thing about Man U's finances, saying the lost £8m by not reaching the next round, they could have had another £30m for reaching the final and could have lost £50m in sponsorship... Plus the Glazers were counting on making more money from Asia and the US, but the Asians are fickle and will switch allegiance and the Americans back winners... And if they don't pay off the debts within a few years the debts will sky rocket because because of the risky repayment plan they're on...
So we might see the back of the Glazers in a few years time, but Man U could do a Leeds, but at 10 times the scale (debts-wise). So the Glazers might have to thibk about taking decisive action and the cheapest thing would be to sack Fergie at the end of the season rather than giving him more money to spend with his recent record...
Fingers & toes crossed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Will
Haha.