Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroes
i dont dj, through choice, so thats not really relevant to me or the argument, my argument or point on this thread
is the problem with the piracy, its way out of control and even adopting your so called change through genres
aproach isnt a real fix for piracy,
You may not DJ but you do run a label that sells a style of music that, with a token exception here or there, sellspretty much entirely to DJs, correct? You aren't going to fix piracy. And, as I said, I don't see piracy as a problem here. I see lack of adaptation. There is no one universal variable that will define your lack of sales. Tastes have changed in many different ways. You can either fight that or adapt.
Quote:
"hold on hes made this killah track now lets buy it", i dont think so, change
makes no difference what so ever in my honest opinion.
Strange because your quote above is exactly how I work. It was the same with mixtapes. If there was a track on it that I wanted, I found it and bought it. Same goes for MP3. And since a good number of entities have offered previews of tracks which you can purchase digitally, Soulseek is not the place where I go looking for the latest released techno. Rather, it's where I get new music from personal friends that isn't released, or songs that are out of print. Neither cuts into any market.
Quote:
Technology for me isnt the problem its attitude of just
getting recogintion for the hours you put in..
If you feel that you aren't getting enough attention, it's likely due to the type of music you are putting out, not because people are pirating it.
Quote:
have no hardened statistics
via goverment reports but i can sure tell you by sales that were down to a quarter of what it was 24 months ago, and
i think i voice for probably 95% of people in the industry too... All iam saying is the piracy is an issue iam not
one who bleats about viynl is a holly grale format over its thin n bitty mp3 cousin. iam merely saying not getting
paid will or should i say is having a mammoth effect on things like, software developers, labels, film, art. its all
suffering......
Specific entities are suffering. But they are merely variables in a greater whole. Others have found a way to make mp3 work for them. But, honestly, most of the bitching I see about piracy just seems like people in techno who can't get over the fact that they aren't popular anymore. Newsflash: For the most part, I don't buy any music coming out on the labels which I used to buy 8 years ago. The same goes for a number of artists who's work I used to buy. The same people that bitch about piracy also tend to bitch about how there is too much crap coming out. Like there is more garbage being released today than there was years ago that is significant enough to keep people away from record stores. Yet, somehow, I've still managed to find tracks by new and old artists that I enjoy and, when I do, if they are available for purchase, like most other DJs, I go and buy them. Losing popularity is not a crisis for the whole. It's a crisis for the entity.
Quote:
i do have one statistic and that is the biggest selling age group for record buying purchases in the uk is 35 to 45
but since almost the dawn of the 1st music media it was 18 to 26. now is that because nothing so called new is being
said across every genre in film, music & art or could it be a coincidence because they know where to get it
from......?
i think we know the answer to that one
I couldn't tell you as I'm not that demographic. Being 30 and not purchasing significant quantities of music anymore, however, I can tell you that it doesn't have to do with piracy. Rather, it stems from the fact that I got bored with scene politics, over-inflated import prices, etc. Digital distribution via the internet has pulled me back more into the market in the last year than any record store with "save our scene" slogans did. To be honest, I look forward to vinyl's eventual death if things stay the same as they are now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtybass
The focus he is making is that it`s the techno "scenes" fault that records aren`t selling, due to stagnation.
Not exactly. I think there is plenty of good music coming out. But, the nature of the game has made it pricier and harder to distribute. I have no loyalty to any record company. In addition, I find some inherent hypocrissy in the messages being given out by people who used every single illegal shortcut they could to produce music in the first place, bitching about lack of sales which they blame on piracy. It's not a "scene" problem. It's an entity problem.
Quote:
The fact is the WHOLE music industry is in crisis due to illegal download.
**** the industry. The WHOLE music industry is not vinyl or CD.
Quote:
But the point is, is that it`s much easier to get pirate stuff, anything you want, as quick as you want, and it is
affecting everyone.
Again, proof? I see a lot of speculation. And Jay Pace just posted some stats that suggest otherwise.
Quote:
You don`t walk into your local footlocker, and then walk out with your corp sucker Nike trainers on for free do you?
Nope. Given their price and what they offer, I just choose not to buy them. The "industry" is merely to egotistical to believe for a second that they are offering something which a number of their earlier market just doesn't want anymore.
Quote:
To even think that the illegal file sharing of music hasn`t affected the whole industry, is not only naeive, but
very stupid.
Until someone can demonstrate to me otherwise, I don't believe it here. The "pirated" copies of my music have made it further than the pressed copies regionally. So, if I really cared to play off that with people I talked to and start selling mp3s online, it's only helped. People who wouldn't have otherwise known the music exists now do. If they don't hear it, there's no sale. If they pirate it, there still might not be any sale but it's no loss. The DJs who actually do play tracks of mine still buy the music. So, I don't see the problem. If less people buy, that's a sign of a failure on my part if I view merit through sales. Fortunately, I don't.
Quote:
We are in a trnasition period right now, from solid product, to virtual product, but even when a full transition is
made I think that the attitude of theft is ok, will still be prevailent.
That attitude was the foundation of techno. Something that a number of thieves seemed to forget once the mainstream industry they supposedly rebelled against offered them a blow job. When you catch more people spinning pirated versions of your music, or can even count more copies of your tracks on Soulseek than have been sold, get back to me.
Quote:
Tocsin, your attitude sucks, and has no real merit. IT`s the kind of argument a teenager puts across.
No. My attitude is merely honest. Honest in the way that "techno" once used to be. It places blame for lack of sales where it belongs, on the person producing and selling the goods. I hate to break it to you guys, but none of you are so popular as to have more people pirating your music than buying it. Most of the world hasn't even heard of you. Get over it and adapt. Live with the fact that a number of people really don't think you offer anything of any worth at all and, yes, they might even steal it and listen to it a couple times. It sucks, but that's life. Unlike a number of other egotisical industry hacks and whores, however, my head isn't so blown up as to view that type pirate as the majority and the reason why my niche market music didn't do so hot in a time period. If you think my attitude sucks, get used to it. It's the attitude of the general public and you are selling to them, not vice versa.