http://picture.funnyjunk.com/pics/euro_vs_america.jpg
damn id tap that shit!!!
the one on the left i mean :lol:
Printable View
http://picture.funnyjunk.com/pics/euro_vs_america.jpg
damn id tap that shit!!!
the one on the left i mean :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
We all know you're dislexic vidal....Quote:
Originally Posted by viagratek
lol
vidal taps anything
:lol: Damn V. You're rep is well known lol
that, or it's the primary subject of anything he says. ;)
I thought we had settled this arguement once and for all.
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-2/956221/Venn.jpg
i would not tap rosanne bar :shock:Quote:
Originally Posted by audioinjection
i dont think i would tap shranz either :lol: (getting back on subject)
This is very much local to his area too...NYC, specifically Brooklyn. Not that I'm knocking NYC or any of the burroughs, but, in the US, depending on what coast you are on, attitudes are VERY different. East Coast, more aggressive and rude, West Coast, more laid back and chill, and Third Coast, well, its the Dirty South, you'll have to experience is for yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ritzi Lee
not even cannibal schranz?Quote:
Originally Posted by viagratek
What you trying to say motherf*cker! :lol: ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Isaac
In the Quantum Mechanical world, the idea that we can measure things exactly breaks down. Let me state this notion more precisely. Suppose a particle has momemtum p and a position x. In a Quantum Mechanical world, I would not be able to measure p and x precisely. There is an uncertainty associated with each measurement, e.g., there is some dp and dx, which I can never get rid of even in a perfect experiment!!!. This is due to the fact that whenever I make a measurement, I must disturb the system. (In order for me to know something is there, I must bump into it.) The size of the uncertainties are not independent, they are related by
dp x dx > h / (2 x pi) = Planck's constant / ( 2 x pi )
The preceding is a statement of The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. So, for example, if I measure x exactly, the uncertainty in p, dp, must be infinite in order to keep the product constant.
don't forget that d=n/n+1
Quote:
Originally Posted by SummerOfSam
LOL! :clap:
Yea.....whatcha tryin to say.....You better recognize, beyotch!!! :rambo: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by SummerOfSam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ritzi Lee
:clap:
My time Machine is almost ready. No need to worry about the future no more. I'm gonna transport us all back to 1992.
ooh...can we go even farther back?Quote:
Originally Posted by massplanck
...i'd like to start trax records but actually pay the artists...
Oh sorry i forgot to tell that dp is a differential.Quote:
Originally Posted by SlavikSvensk
d is not a variable. It is the difference / delta sign.
dp is the difference p(x+t) - p(x), where the limit t --> 0. :)
;)Quote:
Originally Posted by massplanck
I'd like to know in the future which method you used to determine the right lightcone to predict the geodesics in our space-time causality. :cool: