Welcome to the Blackout Audio Techno Forums :: Underground Network.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    Ultimate Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    1,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cascade
    @ that video
    omg thats amazin
    lol
    ive always been into rane and eckler.
    2 dark horses in themixer world making quality.
    i might be bying a new mixer in a few weeks.

    might get a pmc-37 cause they were abasolutly awsome when i tred one last year. fits what i need from a mixer too.
    never been too keen on djm-600, could never hold it when scratching, the chances of performing some serious turntablism on it are slim.
    not bad at all for non turntablist trance djs though, think any effects unit can become cliche after a while, everyone knows what they sound like.

    dont think any bedroom dj needs a 4 channel mixer unless they have 4 inputs, pretty simple equation.

    Iq is there any decent scratch mixers with 4 channels?

    (abit of a contradiction there aint it, idea of a mixer is to make more space on the scratch board, problem is i have 4 inputs, 2 vestax, 2 cdj800)

    Chances are not slim for turntablism at all.
    Saw some amazing turntablism on Saturday with a DJM 600, defintley opened my eyes with the capabilities of this mixer.

    "dont think any bedroom dj needs a 4 channel mixer unless they have 4 inputs, pretty simple equation."

    What if he upgrades his setup?

  2. #22
    Keepin' it Unreal
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Crackpool
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    Chances are not slim for turntablism at all.
    Saw some amazing turntablism on Saturday with a DJM 600, defintley opened my eyes with the capabilities of this mixer.
    Maybe so... But you wouldnt ever find Q-Bert or Craze, Clever or any other dj using a djm 600. Why?? Becuase they are not designed for it. Sure, a talented turntablist can use them for turntablism, but it doesnt make life easy to do it. Plus, the faders would wear out in a very short space of time.

    "dont think any bedroom dj needs a 4 channel mixer unless they have 4 inputs, pretty simple equation."

    What if he upgrades his setup?
    The whole point of this scratch mixer arguement started by asking "If you are only ever going to use 2 channels". If you have plans to upgrade to 4 channels, then fair enough, get a 4 channel mixer. But i dont know anyone who ever uses 4 channels reguarly for it to be a warrented reason to by a mixer. Yes, 3 channels, i know a lot of people who do 3 deck mixing, and you can still get 3 channel scratch mixers. At the end of the day, its all down to personal preferance, and for me, i need something more than 300 channels that im not going to use, and a dodgy over used fx box built in. I like to have a quality built mixer, that lasts. You can say to me that "The djm 600 is a quality well built mixer", but put it next to an ecler hak or a rane, and it will feel like a fisher price toy...

  3. #23
    Ultimate Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    1,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IQ
    Chances are not slim for turntablism at all.
    Saw some amazing turntablism on Saturday with a DJM 600, defintley opened my eyes with the capabilities of this mixer.
    Maybe so... But you wouldnt ever find Q-Bert or Craze, Clever or any other dj using a djm 600. Why?? Becuase they are not designed for it. Sure, a talented turntablist can use them for turntablism, but it doesnt make life easy to do it. Plus, the faders would wear out in a very short space of time.

    "dont think any bedroom dj needs a 4 channel mixer unless they have 4 inputs, pretty simple equation."

    What if he upgrades his setup?
    The whole point of this scratch mixer arguement started by asking "If you are only ever going to use 2 channels". If you have plans to upgrade to 4 channels, then fair enough, get a 4 channel mixer. But i dont know anyone who ever uses 4 channels reguarly for it to be a warrented reason to by a mixer. Yes, 3 channels, i know a lot of people who do 3 deck mixing, and you can still get 3 channel scratch mixers. At the end of the day, its all down to personal preferance, and for me, i need something more than 300 channels that im not going to use, and a dodgy over used fx box built in. I like to have a quality built mixer, that lasts. You can say to me that "The djm 600 is a quality well built mixer", but put it next to an ecler hak or a rane, and it will feel like a fisher price toy...

    Yeah dude, regardless of the whole argument, i was responding to 2 different points made.

  4. #24
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Wigan-Big hat trecking!!
    Posts
    753

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DJCraig Ryan
    "dont think any bedroom dj needs a 4 channel mixer unless they have 4 inputs, pretty simple equation."

    What if he upgrades his setup?
    lmao
    well obviously its a good idea to have a 3plus channel mixe if your gonna use more then 3 inputs

    and like IQ said, real scratch and turntablist would be limited on a djm-600, there not designed for that kinda mixing, period.
    the EQ on a djm-600 is really good though, the effects dont really interreste me, abit limited and over used by pratically everyone who has one.
    Rane are sick mixers, would deffinatly consider one

    question for ya IQ,(or anyone for that matter)

    would you prefere a rane or eckler over a vestax?
    the scratch range of there mixers obviously

    like a empath over a pmc-37?>
    or a tt-56 over a pmc-07?
    or any of the ecklers?
    i was always under the impression that vestax were king leaders in scratch mixer market.
    :?:

  5. #25
    Keepin' it Unreal
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Crackpool
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cascade

    question for ya IQ,(or anyone for that matter)

    would you prefere a rane or eckler over a vestax?
    the scratch range of there mixers obviously

    like a empath over a pmc-37?>
    or a tt-56 over a pmc-07?
    or any of the ecklers?
    i was always under the impression that vestax were king leaders in scratch mixer market.
    :?:
    Deffinately the Rane, all the way. If you look it up, all turntablists who arnt sponsored by a company will tell you that it is the best mixer on the market, and if you havent got the cash, go for the ecler. Vestax arnt bad mixers by any means, but they had the money and a name in the market to give sponsorship to the likes of Q-Bert and such a lot of people think that they are the best. When they brought out the original Pmc O7, it was the best mixer on the market, but they have been far supased now...

  6. #26
    Keepin' it Unreal
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Crackpool
    Posts
    2,836

    Default

    Ive only just found out that ecler do an alternative to the pioneer djm -



    http://www.djforums.com/reviews/mixers/ecler_nuo5.php?

  7. #27
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    8,000

    Default

    Thanks for the insight in to Scratch mixers... anymore thoughts on the mixers I was originally looking towards? :)

    I do find all the info on the Rane, Ecler etc... interesting but I'm looking for a mixer that offers superb sound quality for hard trance mixing. I'm probably going to go for the Xone62.

    Thanks to everyone for the advice and thoughts.
    (\\__/)
    (=\'.\'=)
    (\")_(\")

  8. #28
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cascade
    @ that video
    omg thats amazin
    lol
    ive always been into rane and eckler.
    2 dark horses in themixer world making quality.
    i might be bying a new mixer in a few weeks.

    might get a pmc-37 cause they were abasolutly awsome when i tred one last year. fits what i need from a mixer too.
    never been too keen on djm-600, could never hold it when scratching, the chances of performing some serious turntablism on it are slim.
    not bad at all for non turntablist trance djs though, think any effects unit can become cliche after a while, everyone knows what they sound like.

    dont think any bedroom dj needs a 4 channel mixer unless they have 4 inputs, pretty simple equation.

    Iq is there any decent scratch mixers with 4 channels?

    (abit of a contradiction there aint it, idea of a mixer is to make more space on the scratch board, problem is i have 4 inputs, 2 vestax, 2 cdj800)

    i too am seriously considering the vestax pmc 37 pro.


    it looks awesome
    Ass-to-Ass!

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top