Healthy release rate?

**Internal Error Records** · 13-12-2004, 01:22 AM

Hi Everybody,
What do you think is the ideal rate of release from a label? Once every two months? more , less? Opinions?

G

**fresh_an_funky_design** · 13-12-2004, 01:40 AM

6-8 weeks

**fresh_an_funky_design** · 13-12-2004, 01:41 AM

as long as all the tunes are ready as theres no point rushing a release out if the artist isn't happy with his music

**recoil** · 13-12-2004, 02:28 AM

Doesn't matter, as long as there is quality in quantity.

**dirty_bass** · 13-12-2004, 03:33 AM

yeah, I would say the frewuency is irrelevant, as long as the quality is good.

If you can release frequently, but still keep the quality up, then cool.

**Ritzi Lee** · 13-12-2004, 06:54 AM

Don't push it!
When you're trying to make a time planning,
you're always want to haste yourself.
Despite the quality of the record.

**Jay Sanders** · 13-12-2004, 01:20 PM

Yeah Id have to agree with Dirty Bass.... Frequency is irrelevant!!

Ok it would be nice to have a release every 6 weeks and be on a roll.... but alot of labels do this and some of the releases are just plain cak.

**Udy** · 13-12-2004, 01:30 PM

Nice to have a little anticipation before the next record i reckon, makes it all the better when the next one is a stormer!

**fatcollective** · 13-12-2004, 05:43 PM

yeah i'd say no rush, at the end of the day release when you are happy with what you have. i suppose a good idea would be to whack out your next release as soon as the previous batch have nearly sold out.

**audioinjection** · 14-12-2004, 09:19 PM

quality, not quantity

Thread: Healthy release rate?

Thread Tools

Display

Healthy release rate?

Posting Permissions