Welcome to the Blackout Audio Techno Forums :: Underground Network.
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 92 of 92
  1. #81
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    rio de janeiro
    Posts
    81

    Default

    there r some things i would like everyone to understand


    a) if someone gets music from a label or dj (illegal downl for examp)who dont give permission to do so is stealing (if someone gets samples without paying is stealing etcetcetcetc

    b) if the label says i dont care that they steal from me thats one thing if they mind and most certainly do because they have to make it work at the end of the month $ thats another thing .........................

    one of the most important point is this and it seems that some people r not understanding

    if techno is financially down its bad for everyone who likes techno aspiring djs , labels ertc etc

    will have a really hard time

    im sure the way to make techno forward is certainly not donwloads but buiyng good records

    im not sure if u r really understanding what i mean ,why people make excuses for stealing? why they dont see the big picture?

    instead of focusing in small details and comparisons?

    maybe because many techno djs and people dont really have a lot of life and business experience i think (i mean when u have 19 u see things in one way but when u r 28 u see things in another perespevtive

    i hope the guys who r here for some years understand what im triyng tom say

  2. #82
    M.O.D.
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Swan
    Posts
    24,284

    Default

    totally understand, gustavo. techno is in a recession...
    The law is not the private property of lawyers, nor is justice the exclusive province of judges and juries. In the final analysis, true justice is not a matter of courts and law books, but of a commitment in each of us to liberty and mutual respect. - Jimmy Carter

  3. #83
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The Singularity
    Posts
    8,298

    Default

    I think we`ve said all that needs to be said here now, I`ll leave this topic up for another day and then lock it, as really it`s going round in circles, and the refreshing thing about it, is that the majority of people think that earning bread out of the theft of someone elses work is wrong.
    Solitary by nature.
    Isolation is the gift.
    Does anyone have courage to stand apart any more?

    myspace.com/dirtybassgrooves
    http://www.myspace.com/dirtybassvoidloss
    http://www.subgenius.com

  4. #84
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    4,066

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirty_bass
    I think we`ve said all that needs to be said here now, I`ll leave this topic up for another day and then lock it, as really it`s going round in circles, and the refreshing thing about it, is that the majority of people think that earning bread out of the theft of someone elses work is wrong.
    I just wonder how much of that is lip service. People here have said it's wrong but haven't answered my questions. Do people use uncleared samples? Do people here not buy music that uses uncleared samples? Do people contact every artist who's work they use on a mixtape? I don't agree that piracy has really had much of a dent on techno sales at all. Techno got big without any help from the mainstream industry and copyright law largely due to advancements in technology that made it affordable for artists to achieve high quality results without using any of the middle men who held onto their positions as a result of the mainstream industry. If techno that we liked started out in the same game as everyone else, it would have fizzled out and died before it ever even took off. The Winston's should be rich as a result of the techno scene. Any good sams here contact them about infringing works? Fake and uneven morality is just hypocritical. For those of you who have never sampled anything nor bought anything with infringing material because that is how strongly you feel about "theft," kudos to you. I'd be surprised if there was a single person on this board who could say they are such a person. And, to those who might be that way, well, in your eyes I guess I'm just a thief but, in the end, I simply don't care. Besides, the whole theft argument pretty much ignores the fact that the trend jumpers who helped the sound blow up for a bit got very sick of it while, at the same time, production of similar sounding crap increased ten fold.
    A person belonging to one or more Order is just as likely to carry a flag of the counter-establishment as the flag of the establishment, just as long as it is a flag. --P.D.

  5. #85
    Ultimate Freak
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,417

    Default

    who was it? (i'm not reading through 6 pages of rants to find the named and shamed dj)

  6. #86
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    indianapolis, USA
    Posts
    621

    Default

    what i want to know is...how exactly did they determine the "illegal" mp3s?

    what if he bought some, friends gave him some (of their own stuff for argument's sake), and then he downloaded some? most people i know actually do use a combination of these, so how do the authorities make that determination.

    i would think that would be pretty importanat if they're gonna fine you 200 euros per mp3 to know exactly which ones are he naughty ones, dontcha think?

  7. #87
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    indianapolis, USA
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joseph Isaac
    Quote Originally Posted by The Divide

    But string theory says that all matter (including air) is made out of vibrating strings :lol:
    I'm stoked to see other theoretical physicists, or at least enthusiasts, are on this board...Suffice it to say, some of the most intelligent people I know listen to techno. :clap:
    yay!!! physics geeks unite! count me in too. can't do math but love the theory... :)

  8. #88
    Ultimate Freak
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by djshiva
    what i want to know is...how exactly did they determine the "illegal" mp3s?

    what if he bought some, friends gave him some (of their own stuff for argument's sake), and then he downloaded some? most people i know actually do use a combination of these, so how do the authorities make that determination.

    i would think that would be pretty importanat if they're gonna fine you 200 euros per mp3 to know exactly which ones are he naughty ones, dontcha think?
    they probably knew from downlaod streams. alot of big comertial labels set up fake mp3's in the hope to catch regular downlaoders and they trace their ip number

  9. #89
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The Life of Fife
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by djshiva
    what if he bought some,
    friends gave him some (of their own stuff for argument's sake),
    then he downloaded some?
    Legal, legal and illegal. Fairly simple really. If you haven't paid for the track or been giving express permission to use it by someone holding rights to it it's illegal.

  10. #90
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    1982
    Posts
    5,256

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by djshiva
    Quote Originally Posted by Joseph Isaac
    Quote Originally Posted by The Divide

    But string theory says that all matter (including air) is made out of vibrating strings :lol:
    I'm stoked to see other theoretical physicists, or at least enthusiasts, are on this board...Suffice it to say, some of the most intelligent people I know listen to techno. :clap:
    yay!!! physics geeks unite! count me in too. can't do math but love the theory... :)
    :lol:

    Know anything about monatomic elements?

    (totally off topic)

  11. #91
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    indianapolis, USA
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j_s

    then allow me to play devil's advocate for a second here and suggest that perhaps less money involved in music = less temptation to 'sell out' = more innovation & creativity?
    as a full-fledged anarchist i am still gonna have to disagree with you and say that as far as techno goes, not too many fuggas are making a shit ton of cash, or play music accessible enough to be corporate sell-outs.

    most techno producers i know, even the ones who are fairly well-known, are not making a ton of money. and last time i checked, sony and volkswagen weren't beating down our favorite techno producers' doors, so i am fairly unconcerned that my techno brothers and sisters are selling out.

    i may be a dirty, unapologetic anarchist who thinks that capitalism is evil dirty business, but i still gotta eat, and so does everyone i know...

  12. #92
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    indianapolis, USA
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mirsha
    Quote Originally Posted by djshiva
    what if he bought some,
    friends gave him some (of their own stuff for argument's sake),
    then he downloaded some?
    Legal, legal and illegal. Fairly simple really. If you haven't paid for the track or been giving express permission to use it by someone holding rights to it it's illegal.
    but again, even if there were illegal ones, how do you determine that, especially if you are being fined PER mp3. that's a pretty important distinction.

    and unless italian authorities are really way more sophisticated than american ones (which wouldn't be far fetched prolly), i don't think they're that ****ing smart really...

 

 
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top