
Originally Posted by
eyes without a face
it wasnt the incident that offended me (well it did but i mean in this situation), the initial post was a blatant generalisation and dig at Liverpool which needed re-addressing, it was offensive and uncalled for, as the incident can and does happen in places all over the world and it was wrong for Ritzi to comment the way he did, there's no disputing that and for that we are allowed to and have the right to comment on his words