Quote Originally Posted by dirty_bass
Quote Originally Posted by Sunil

Irrelevant? Don't be ignorant just because you want to have a different opinion to everyone else ;)

I find your comment more ignorant, because it`s based on an an assumption.
I consider him to be irrelevant. It doesn`t mean he isn`t relevant.
Irrelevant to ME
That`s not ignorance.
He simply has no relevance to me.
I didn`t get into techno via him at all.
I`ve heard his stuff from way back to now and I don`t like it.
It`s purely that.
I don`t like it.
Sorry if this is a shock to you, but I can`t stand mills music.
Doesn`t mean he isn`t relevant to other people.
Is it some kind of techno passport.
You can`t like techno unless you acknowledge mills
:dontevengothere:
You may not have got into techno via him, but the use of 'irrelevant' whatever way you meant it is just daft. Have you ever been in a club when "Step To Enchantment" got played, when "Seawolf" was tearing the system apart or when even "The Bells" was being lapped up countless times in the one night? He may do some run of the Mills stuff, sure, I won't disagree there... for someone who prides themselves on their open mindedness I often think you are anything but, otherwise you might have better words to say abouts the Mills', Beyers, Beltrams, Surgeons who get few kudos from you. How about getting familar with some of these people's catalogues? I'm not saying you have to like these people or need to have them in your blood to be 'techno', I just think some of your outlook or opinions on important producers suggest that you aren't familar with too much of their good material.