Fruity

[AcidTrash]

Does Fruity Studio have inherant limitations on sound quality. I'm thinking not. I'm after some definitive answers here rather than snobbish speculation.

[TechMouse]

I'd say not.

Fruity (especially the later versions) is a very mature product, and it has a massive user base. I get the impression the development team are very good - in the idealistic sense as well as in the "technically competent" sense.

I never really got it though.

[Mirsha]

The earlier version were terrible but I've not heard much compaints about quality in the newer versions.

[Barely Human]

I dont know why fruity has this stigma about it. Along side ableton, it has to be one of the most usefull, powerful and easy to use next generation sequancers. The sound quality is excelent aslong as you know what you are doing with it.

[RDR]

I dont know why fruity has this stigma about it. Along side ableton, it has to be one of the most usefull, powerful and easy to use next generation sequancers. The sound quality is excelent aslong as you know what you are doing with it.

I like it, it has a fat sound to it.

[eyes without a face]

yay ANOTHER thread debating wether fruity is adequate enough

it is ;)

[AcidTrash]

Still really paranoid about the stigma of it for some reason. I should chill out.

[TechMouse]

Still really paranoid about the stigma of it for some reason. I should chill out.

HA HA!

That's the funniest post I've read all day.

[dan the acid man]

just use what you want and try and get the best out of it, forget what other people think

[anode]

exactly! tell em to squid ringz 'n crab stix rite off!

ive heard many a top choon produced on fruity...people like to snob thingz off...

[nova]

Still really paranoid about the stigma of it for some reason. I should chill out.

i didnt think id here you saying that :lol: . after my logic post