Punk 63 - From the Valleey 'new tune'

[fresh_an_funky_design]

Punk 63 aka Joe Giacomet & Rythymn Logistics

'From the Valleey'


http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...?bandID=304223

[fatcollective]

this is pretty good joe, considering you have only been at it for a few months, your doing ok. i would say try and brighten up them synths in the back and maybe add a ride in there somewhere.

well done mate :clap:

[dirty_bass]

Not really into the tune that much, there`s not enough coordination between the sounds for me. Sounds like a lot of non related parts stuck together.

Production wise, overall this is a bit dry and flat, and lacks sparkle and life in the mix.
The kick is a little buried and could do with a little top end to cut throught the mix a little.
Those conga things that are the main percussive drive of the track, just sound too thin and untreated. Maybe try compressing them for presence and width, and a little ring modulation or something, to make it a little more techno and a bit less progressive house.
The hats lack width and sparkle too, a little compression or maybe bit crushing would give them more bite and width and give more flow to the overall beat, as it seems a little uncomfortable and disjointed, and lacking in funk.

[xfive]

Not a bad start, just needs some sound treatment and different compression action I think ;)

[fresh_an_funky_design]

Not really into the tune that much, there`s not enough coordination between the sounds for me. Sounds like a lot of non related parts stuck together.

Production wise, overall this is a bit dry and flat, and lacks sparkle and life in the mix.
The kick is a little buried and could do with a little top end to cut throught the mix a little.
Those conga things that are the main percussive drive of the track, just sound too thin and untreated. Maybe try compressing them for presence and width, and a little ring modulation or something, to make it a little more techno and a bit less progressive house.
The hats lack width and sparkle too, a little compression or maybe bit crushing would give them more bite and width and give more flow to the overall beat, as it seems a little uncomfortable and disjointed, and lacking in funk.

the question is how much does it cost to to **** up my tune, globewarmer 1 was great

[fresh_an_funky_design]

[fresh_an_funky_design]

[fresh_an_funky_design]

[fresh_an_funky_design]

[fresh_an_funky_design]

:!:

[fresh_an_funky_design]

[fresh_an_funky_design]

:clap:

[fresh_an_funky_design]

[fresh_an_funky_design]

:cry:

[fresh_an_funky_design]

[fresh_an_funky_design]

:lol:

[eyes without a face]

Not really into the tune that much, there`s not enough coordination between the sounds for me. Sounds like a lot of non related parts stuck together.

Production wise, overall this is a bit dry and flat, and lacks sparkle and life in the mix.
The kick is a little buried and could do with a little top end to cut throught the mix a little.
Those conga things that are the main percussive drive of the track, just sound too thin and untreated. Maybe try compressing them for presence and width, and a little ring modulation or something, to make it a little more techno and a bit less progressive house.
The hats lack width and sparkle too, a little compression or maybe bit crushing would give them more bite and width and give more flow to the overall beat, as it seems a little uncomfortable and disjointed, and lacking in funk.

the question is how much does it cost to to **** up my tune, globewarmer 1 was great

what does that mean? what does Globewarmer have to do with it?

[dirty_bass]

Not really into the tune that much, there`s not enough coordination between the sounds for me. Sounds like a lot of non related parts stuck together.

Production wise, overall this is a bit dry and flat, and lacks sparkle and life in the mix.
The kick is a little buried and could do with a little top end to cut throught the mix a little.
Those conga things that are the main percussive drive of the track, just sound too thin and untreated. Maybe try compressing them for presence and width, and a little ring modulation or something, to make it a little more techno and a bit less progressive house.
The hats lack width and sparkle too, a little compression or maybe bit crushing would give them more bite and width and give more flow to the overall beat, as it seems a little uncomfortable and disjointed, and lacking in funk.

the question is how much does it cost to to **** up my tune, globewarmer 1 was great

Globearmer 2 is even better, now that seb has a better grip on production, my mastering for him has become easier, as he is thickening his sounds a lot more, before I really had to stretch to get width out of his stuff.
I can help out with mastering (well, a master mixdown) for you, and generally I don`t charge, I trade in goodwill returned rather than money.

[fresh_an_funky_design]

right ive just read what ive wrote after coming out of some crazy vodka binge, i am really to sorry to every person ive offendended i dont even remeber writing it but what ive said is well out of order so im sorry, to give you an idea of my state i woke up in a phone box with 1 shoe on and my mixer for some ****ed up reason.

[fresh_an_funky_design]

by the way globearmer 2 is ****ing awesome, the intergalactic remix rocks this is no dig at seb marx i think his stuff is awesome, seriously guys please just ignore what ive wrote im so sorry