Some of you people need to spend a little less effort on judging and a lot more effort on understanding.
With regard to Fritz Lang's "Metropolis" - I've never seen the full original version, but from what I have seen it commands full respect. It's a truly innovative work.
With regard to Jeff Mills' alternative soundtrack - I was lucky enough to see the screening of this along with the film at the Royal Festival Hall last year. It's excellent, particularly when combined with the visual element. Some of the timings are superb. It's a real shame that it won't get a DVD release.
There is no "Jeff Mills connection" to get, one thing merely inspired the other, but I think that has already been explained.
With regard to Jeff Mills DJ fee. Yes, it's high. Also high is the interest his name creates on a line up. Also high is the number of people who attend a night because he is playing. Also high is the amount of money promoters make out of his name. Also high is that very factor on promoters' list of priorities when booking him. Thus, his fee is justified, in my opinion. The market leads. Do you think that if Mills dropped his fee by 90%, that the promoters would drop the ticket price? No. So, as he is being exploited, so he deserves to gain as much as possible from that exploitative situation. Do you think he believes he deserves £10,000 for playing records? I doubt it, but that's not the only thing that needs taking into account when you are at his level in the game.
When any one of you inspire such interest, when any one of you has blown people away night after night across every continent in the world, when any one of you have produced such a unique and groundbreaking body of work, when any one of you have inspired thousands of people to take up DJing and production...then you can come on here and justifiably bitch about it.
The guy has been doing his thing since the 80s. Some of you people here were still in nappies and most if not all of you will fail completely to achieve a fraction of what he has - so learn to have some f.ucking respect. eyes without a face - you do a remarkable job of revealing your youthful ignorance. Perhaps you ought to go and gain more of an understanding of techno music before spouting off your ill thought out crap across this and other forums. Your narrow mindedness and misguided demeanour never ceases to amaze me.
And before anyone wants to accuse me of being some sort of fanboy - don't bother. I just know what I'm talking about, have observed his and many other careers over the past 11 or 12 years, have had the respect for the music and it's makers to learn something of their histories - and am perfectly able to acknowledge simple and obvious truths such as the fact that, for example "Mills ain't as good as he used to be" etc. etc.
One unfortunate factor in all this is the fact - yes, FACT - that the old saying "you had to be there", is absolutely true. For those that witnessed Mills at his height, there was nobody, and there still is nobody, who ever came close to what he was doing in the mid-90s. Sorry if you missed it, but just cos you don't understand doesn't give you the right to diss a man who more than anyone else has shaped the way techno exists today. Not that I am saying his influence has produced a utopian scenario - of course it hasn't. Judging by some of the diabolical garbage that gets discussed on this forum his legacy looks extremely tarnished - but whose fault is that? His, or the hordes of people who chose to imitate rather than innovate?