that's what i'm talkin' about! :!:Originally Posted by djshiva
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
that's what i'm talkin' about! :!:Originally Posted by djshiva
The law is not the private property of lawyers, nor is justice the exclusive province of judges and juries. In the final analysis, true justice is not a matter of courts and law books, but of a commitment in each of us to liberty and mutual respect. - Jimmy Carter
i DO agree, by the way. wasn't debating that point. and i would love to have a discussion about how various people have tried to translate what thoughts they had in their head into music...new thread maybe...Originally Posted by SlavikSvensk
start it up! i, for one, :love: the abstract threads...Originally Posted by djshiva
The law is not the private property of lawyers, nor is justice the exclusive province of judges and juries. In the final analysis, true justice is not a matter of courts and law books, but of a commitment in each of us to liberty and mutual respect. - Jimmy Carter
To answer this question I would say no, no one will reach that level of fame in techno now as the likes of Mills, UR were pioneers of something new. However if the scene got of its arse and tried to pull in a younger crowd then maybe the whole thing could do a full circle with a slightly more evolved slant.
I think the real inventors of today are the people who create interactive devices/software and use them to advance their own personal expression. Those are the people who are doing something relatively new and can push back the limitations of a standard sequencing package.