Chelsea were much better than Liverpool, it could of been 4-0, Crespo had 2 goals disallowed
yeah could have been 4-0 to us if people headed into the net from 6 yards away in all those many chances we had in teh first half. you chat absolute shit saying they were by far the better team. they were shit. they just have clinical finishers. that was the difference. and only one of crespos goals were actually onside you tit.

Chelsea are by far much better than Liverpool, Liverpool only have 1 player that would get in the Chelsea side and that is Gerrard and Rafa plays him out of position.
you chat shite again. even the commentators pointed out we are the closest to chelsea and said the same as others on here that all we need is a clinical striker and we will take the crown from them and in case you didnt notice... had we taken those many chances then you would not have been able to slag off rafas decision to put gerrard on the right. we did everything but score.


we rue those first half misses after so much dominance...

one thing is clear... with a clinical striker, we will topple chelsea.. we are far more creative in midfield. we walked through them until they got that sucker punch first goal. even then we dominated in the first 15 mins after half time.