Welcome to the Blackout Audio Techno Forums :: Underground Network.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 42
  1. #1
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Münster, Germany
    Posts
    2,753

    Default What's your daw/host and why?

    I use Fruity Studio mainly but am planning to get deeper into Ableton Live or Cubase perhaps. Possibly using stuff bounced down from FL or rewired..

    What do YOU use and why?

    :)

  2. #2
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    871

    Default

    Cubase Sx , because i have used it since v2 on the Atari ;)

  3. #3
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Belfast
    Posts
    601

    Default

    haha
    i was gonna say the same thing :techno:

  4. #4
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    dat der derby
    Posts
    967

    Default

    Logic 7 Pro,
    because i use a mac and it runs so smoothly in os-x
    i personally prefer it to cubase, the plug-ins that come with it are outstanding , also it uses AU plugins which are much more stable than VSt's and i think sound better.


    the only down side with logic 7 is you do have to buy it,you cant really copy it and it comes with a hefty price tag.

  5. #5
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    105

    Default

    Mine is Cubase sx3 coz its easy to use and good quality!!

  6. #6
    Ultimate Freak
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    la
    Posts
    1,843

    Default

    Ableton Live 5

    I really don't need to explain why... :techno:

  7. #7
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Live 5.

    Does everything I need it to...I still have yet to run into any major roadblocks with it, besides the problem with the Absynth patch I had 2 weeks ago, which is now sorted.

  8. #8
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Münster, Germany
    Posts
    2,753

    Default

    yeah, live + fruity seems the way to go for me. atm :cheese:

    please go on, peeps!

  9. #9
    Ultimate Freak
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    la
    Posts
    1,843

    Default

    Oh and I guess I should mention I'm on a PC. I built it myself last March... AMD 3200+ 1GB etc etc
    Sucker boots in like 10 seconds. :eyes:

    Macs are lovely but $$$$

  10. #10
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Live 4, though probably upgrading to 5 with the new machine.

    Using Live mostly because its inhouse Sampler / Effects are pretty tight and low on the CPU usage. And of course because it can be used to perform Live. I do however find the MIDI editing in it is absolute ARSE compared to every other sequencer I've used.

    Any improvements to that in 5?
    The Rev
    Ordained in the Ministry of Techno
    www.gothamgrooves.com
    www.myspace.com/therevufi

  11. #11
    Ultimate Freak
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    la
    Posts
    1,843

    Default

    I really don't see why people complain about the midi implementation in Live.
    It does everything I need it to do.

    If you need to edit midi at the event level you have issues anyway :cheese:

  12. #12
    BOA Mod
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    10,382

    Default

    Except record sysex data?


    Live 5, OSX, G4 1.5 gig powerbook 768ram for live+O1X, SX3, logic express 7, digital performer, Peak 4

    Pentium 2.4, 2gigram, Cubase sx 3, Live 5, soundforge, XP, O1X for studio


    Live 5's midi implementation is chronic. Navigation is terrible and the tools laughable.

    Im a registered user of all of the above BTW except peak.

  13. #13
    BOA Mod
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    10,382

    Default

    remember when people had MIDI gear???? your sequencer is the heart of a hardware studio, not a VSTi one. Cubase still kicks arse when it comes to managing external gear, logic used to have better timing on the outboard, but since apple bought them out they really dont seem to give a shit, expecially on the sounddiver front.


    Cubase is a good program for keeping everything in check midiwise, its just that IMHO the sound engine lacks that little VA Va VOOM...

  14. #14
    BOA Mod
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    10,382

    Default

    Ps.. i know about the offset issue in cubase, its curable... i love all these programs in their own little way, just a tool for a job.

    And BTW when it comes to recoridng audio... pro tools with the 001 or the 002 sounds blooming fabulous!

  15. #15
    Parsnip
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bangalore, India
    Posts
    15,336

    Default

    I like using lots of different bits of software (and hardware) because everything has it's strengths.

    Cubase is the bit I know best though. (After OctaMED, but that's getting old now!)

  16. #16
    BOA Mod
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    10,382

    Default

    OctaMED! get tracking!

  17. #17
    Parsnip
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bangalore, India
    Posts
    15,336

    Default

    You knowsit, klaaaaaaart.

  18. #18
    BOA Mod
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    10,382

    Default

    Safe as ****

  19. #19
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    621

    Default

    OctaMed is coool ! Haven't used that since I was little, might install it in a tic

    Protools is the final production tool of choice. But I've just installed FL Studio on the PC so I can do some fake scratching :)

  20. #20
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Pah, where do I get a tracker for a Mac? !

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top