just having an arguement with somebody who is trying to inform me that hydraulix productions are loopy and lack dept..
just wondering what everyone else thinks?
just having an arguement with somebody who is trying to inform me that hydraulix productions are loopy and lack dept..
just wondering what everyone else thinks?
go and play him a dj tool record, that will end the stupid argument
Life is "trying things to see if they work"
Finally getting around to updating my site
http://www.plus27design.co.uk/
Dave knows scooter lyrics
*she likes purist techno
what's purist techno when its at home?
god knows.. techno for snobs as far as i know?!?!
What nonsense. Some good production work on hydraulix.
No offence to ya mate R-tech, but is she deaf or just inexperienced?
inexperienced!!! :lol:Originally Posted by dodgyedgy
yeah there are some phat tracks on hydraulix, and depth is subjective really, of course they'l have depth, but obviously not as much as productions by say Aril Brikha or Stewart Walker, off the top of my head, but there not supposed to really, sounds like your mate cant seperate her own personal preference from production values
i find a slap usually iron's out any underlying problems
slap her with a wet haddock, anyway who we talking about... anyone we know
?
there is some good purist techno out there, but usually to me it it sounds like an excuse to drop the production qualityand loop it.
well if by purist techno she means the deeper, more indulgent side of things, then the production standards will be anything but dropped, they will vastly improve. Compare the production of some of say, Diego's seriously deep stuff compared to about 95% of hard techno/acid techno and the production differences are vastly noticable, as unfortunately with alot of the dancefloor stuff people seem to be content just to have that big flat kick at the front of the mix and everything else buried in behind it
there's good and bad produced records on every label though, i really dont know a single label who havent put out an underproduced record at some point, wether or not they deem it phat and full of depth.
Sometimes they can be a bit loopy, and lack depth, and sometimes they can be fairly "deep"
Does it matter?
Hydraulix is good, professionally executed solid up-tempo party techno with a dose of `avin-it-ness.
If you want detroit, get a detroit record. If you want schranze get a schnranze record.
Your mate sounds confused.
Does she expect some 6/8 deep experimental audio experiment on hydraulix or somthing?
Solitary by nature.
Isolation is the gift.
Does anyone have courage to stand apart any more?
myspace.com/dirtybassgrooves
http://www.myspace.com/dirtybassvoidloss
http://www.subgenius.com
haha exactly, its like comparing Twerk to DDR
doesnt really work
Loosely translated: You've lost the argument before you've started.Originally Posted by rhythmtech
She won't listen to sense.
i bet she did not have in mind technical depth ;)
non serviam
i've heard ade fenton play hydraulix records. he did have the labels covered up so knowone in the booth knew what they were (a bit 80s hip-hop...or not), but at least he was prepared to play something becauxse he liked it, and not just because it was on a certain label, and conforming to a certain standard.
there is so many reasons this is just a wrong thing to do.Originally Posted by mattboyslim
Solitary by nature.
Isolation is the gift.
Does anyone have courage to stand apart any more?
myspace.com/dirtybassgrooves
http://www.myspace.com/dirtybassvoidloss
http://www.subgenius.com
I guess, but then who else, who has ever played for atomic jam, would play a hydraulix record?Originally Posted by dirty_bass
I guess he was saving his arse from the bullshit that certain people in that scene would give him for playing 'london' records
thats so fuc king sad, that you get sh it for playing an 'acid' techno record.Originally Posted by mattboyslim
all this time i thought it was hardhouse lol
non serviam
Bit pretentious...Originally Posted by mattboyslim