that last post made it sound like i think playing 45 tracks an hour is impressive too.
that wasn't the point.
all i meant was that it's not the number of tracks - it's the mix as a whole. so whether it's 45, 33 or whatever who cares...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
that last post made it sound like i think playing 45 tracks an hour is impressive too.
that wasn't the point.
all i meant was that it's not the number of tracks - it's the mix as a whole. so whether it's 45, 33 or whatever who cares...