one of my favorite players, but to one of my least favorite teams :(
oh well, at least he's not headed to chelsea or real madrid
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
one of my favorite players, but to one of my least favorite teams :(
oh well, at least he's not headed to chelsea or real madrid
The law is not the private property of lawyers, nor is justice the exclusive province of judges and juries. In the final analysis, true justice is not a matter of courts and law books, but of a commitment in each of us to liberty and mutual respect. - Jimmy Carter
No because Chelsea or Real Madrid wouldn't want an aging striker.
You gotta say YES ! to another excess
Don't get me wrong he was a quality player in his day.
You gotta say YES ! to another excess
we shall soon see if he is past it i ope he does well he was a top top player at celtic
good coach for rooney
Well... I thought United didn't so loans, and for just 3 months too ('til the start of the Swedish league), seems a little desperate almost, not the sign of a team that has loads of money to spend, a 35 year old on loan... Dunno if he'll be eligible for europe, but it seems a bit strange, they have 4 strikers on permanent deals so why give one spot to someone who will only be around a short space of time?
Of course they were going to loan out Smith, dunno what's happened there, but even so, I bet they won't be signing Torres or anyone now, so doesn't look so good if you look at it like that... I daresay he'll do pretty well, but still.
it's a good move from Sir Alex, he needed a short term solution to the forward cover problem and now he has solved it in one swift stroke...
Larsson is still a hell of a player, he proved that in the Champions League final, he'll do a job for us no question...
Numeric