No because Chelsea or Real Madrid wouldn't want an aging striker.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
No because Chelsea or Real Madrid wouldn't want an aging striker.
You gotta say YES ! to another excess
Don't get me wrong he was a quality player in his day.
You gotta say YES ! to another excess
we shall soon see if he is past it i ope he does well he was a top top player at celtic
good coach for rooney
Well... I thought United didn't so loans, and for just 3 months too ('til the start of the Swedish league), seems a little desperate almost, not the sign of a team that has loads of money to spend, a 35 year old on loan... Dunno if he'll be eligible for europe, but it seems a bit strange, they have 4 strikers on permanent deals so why give one spot to someone who will only be around a short space of time?
Of course they were going to loan out Smith, dunno what's happened there, but even so, I bet they won't be signing Torres or anyone now, so doesn't look so good if you look at it like that... I daresay he'll do pretty well, but still.
it's a good move from Sir Alex, he needed a short term solution to the forward cover problem and now he has solved it in one swift stroke...
Larsson is still a hell of a player, he proved that in the Champions League final, he'll do a job for us no question...
Numeric
Guiseppe Rossi looks like a little gem of a player, why not put a bit of faith in him!?