this is a new low

[BRADLEE]

the only stuff i like bootleged is the bootek stuff there are sum gems on there i personaly cain the killers 1 , anyway just dont like sc hranz bootlegs they crap, at least with somthing like a bootek they are well put together a nd good clean production....

by the way this terrible.......hahahahahah

I'm on the same page as you amigo. Can't say that I like all of them, but those are the only ones I consider acceptable either.

But yeah, this shit is awful. Reminds me of happy hardcore and schranz...:upset:

[Honeey]

Oh it's so innovative........and ground breaking........NOT

People actually pay money for that?

Oh man and it's on vinyl too :wot:

[dirty_bass]

There`s some double standards in here.
I mean, this`ll probably sell loads, and the feet will be moving on the dancefloor.
So what`s the problem?

[djfilthmonger]

i think the problem is that it is giving schranz a bad name there some good choons out there , fair enough i dont listen much anymore but i still like a bit of it, but these bootlegs wtf?

[The Overfiend]

There`s some double standards in here.
I mean, this`ll probably sell loads, and the feet will be moving on the dancefloor.
So what`s the problem?

Where's Steve and what have you done with him.

[dirty_bass]

Where's Steve and what have you done with him.

I guess you don`t understand saracsm.

It is the lowest form of wit you know.

There`s always discussions in this place about techno, and how some music is ok, and others is a sell out, and then people justify shit by citing record sales or the amount of people dancing or whatever.

So I say, yeah, ok, but then you gotta suck up shit like this record, cos it`s just as valid as any other crap if you justify things by sales and moving feet.

So what the hell, more records like this please.

why not?

[rhythmtech]

I guess you don`t understand saracsm.

It is the lowest form of wit you know.

There`s always discussions in this place about techno, and how some music is ok, and others is a sell out, and then people justify shit by citing record sales or the amount of people dancing or whatever.

So I say, yeah, ok, but then you gotta suck up shit like this record, cos it`s just as valid as any other crap if you justify things by sales and moving feet.

So what the hell, more records like this please.

why not?

my point was nothing to do with sales on this thread.. and all to do with how shite i think the actual record is as a piece of music.

[The Overfiend]

I guess you don`t understand saracsm.

It is the lowest form of wit you know.

There`s always discussions in this place about techno, and how some music is ok, and others is a sell out, and then people justify shit by citing record sales or the amount of people dancing or whatever.

So I say, yeah, ok, but then you gotta suck up shit like this record, cos it`s just as valid as any other crap if you justify things by sales and moving feet.

So what the hell, more records like this please.

why not?

Wow, I guess I don't I must be like a mental midget or something to your Socrates.
I'll digress now with the rest of my monkey friends.
(insert Tarzan call here)

[BRADLEE]

I guess you don`t understand saracsm.

It is the lowest form of wit you know.

There`s always discussions in this place about techno, and how some music is ok, and others is a sell out, and then people justify shit by citing record sales or the amount of people dancing or whatever.

So I say, yeah, ok, but then you gotta suck up shit like this record, cos it`s just as valid as any other crap if you justify things by sales and moving feet.

So what the hell, more records like this please.

why not?

I think what Tony meant is that the comment wasn't something you'd normally say homie. That's why he was asking if you got kidknapped Steve. At least that's how I read into things.

[dirty_bass]

I think what Tony meant is that the comment wasn't something you'd normally say homie. That's why he was asking if you got kidknapped Steve. At least that's how I read into things.

I know man.

And hence the "sarcasm is the lowest form of wit"
comment.

I was having jollies.

this place seems to need another humour injection.

So this is a bad record?

But it will probably rock the floor, and shift loads of units.
I thought the general attitude in this place had become, if it rocks the floor it`s ok?

Or is there a set level of tolerable predictability and cheesiness, the point at which it is exceeded, then it becomes a bad techno record?

Is there a scale or a meter that we can use to rate stuff with.

Is there a points system?

Like, Boney M gets say 10 points of cheesiness
But I dunno, some sample from Terminator only gets 2?

I mean, to my uneducated ears, this is just schranze.

but apparently, it`s bad schranze.

I`m having difficulty understanding where that level is any more.

Surely anything that works on the floor is ok now isn`t it?

I`m not trying to hate on schranze. I don`t hate it, I just don`t listen to it.