can anyone recommend any software synths that they really couldnt be without.
i'm using absynth 2 at the moment but would like something fresh to get my teeth into, looking for something really lush, and natural sounding really!
cheers
p
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
can anyone recommend any software synths that they really couldnt be without.
i'm using absynth 2 at the moment but would like something fresh to get my teeth into, looking for something really lush, and natural sounding really!
cheers
p
absynth would be one of them anyway... absynth 4 is out now ,althought im still on 3. try FM8, Massive & uhe Zebra
sylenth has a very fat core-sound and is easy to handle, massive seemed a little bit overkill for my cpu.
http://www.lennardigital.com/modules/downloads/
There is so many and there is some quality stuff in the free world, too!
Non-free: Predator, Phoscyon (303 on steroids), Albino, stuff from gmedia, Arturia stuff. I really woudln't know where to start. Depends what you are looking for and how much you want to/are able to tweak. Sound-wise sylenth really struck me.
definately looking for something thats tweekable. want to make some kick ass lush soundscapes to mix with some heavy ass beats
Korg Digital Legacy
100 quid... what a bargain! Like having the synths there...
VST synths? Gotta be
Subtractor
ES1
Xpand!
Fruityloops (as a synth in its own right)
Reaktor.
triangle 2
vanguard
abl pro
v station
massive (only just got this, but it is warm :cheese: )
ps
native instruments synths are the dogs danglies when it comes to quality. absynth, fm8 etc sound great. i just dont have the time to learn to program them at the min
past few weeks i have found drumazon to be excellant. not used any of my hardware drum machines since getting this.
Agreed, drumazon is nice. Let's wait for nepheton now!
does it only do 909. if so its def not for me.
used to death imo, but thats just my opinion
anybody used atmosphere by spectrasonic. would be interested on any comments if you've used it!
yep, drumazon is based around the 909. still better than only samples for some oldschool flava... don't really use it, though...
Atmosphere is ok but end of the day it just a rompler. Never really been a fan of a rompler, would rather just have the sample banks and plug into a sampler myself. The filters ain't all that on thatmosphere either.
Should be interesting to see who has the better 808 emulation D16 or Audiorealism. Think ABL2 is better than Phoscyon. But should be close on the drum machine front.
909 may well be played out but i still like it 20 years on. Great to layer up with other kits and breaks.
Regarding Abl2 and Phos. i have heard different opinions by owners of a 303. Some swear by one, some by the other. I guess if you like 303s having both is the best idea. Esp. because Phos. also brings some extra features to the table, dist. etc which is why people compare it to the devilfish mods. I guess nowadays we are spoilt for choices...
I don't get why people are biased against romplers. I mean, you can view synths as very limited romplers (any rompler worth it's salt can do the basic waveforms that a basic subtractive synth is capable of), with slightly better aliasing and maybe a trick like PWM, but that's not much more.Atmosphere is ok but end of the day it just a rompler.
The "how you arrive at the result", via sample or synthesis, shouldn't really matter IMO...and yet, in people's minds synths are the sexy real thing, and romplers illegitimate fakers, regardless of the result. It's weird.
Last edited by rounser; 08-05-2007 at 03:54 PM.
One thing i couldn't live without is Battery! I couldn't program drums on anything else.
When i comes to creating basslines its a mixture of Spectrasonics Trilogy and +z3ta. I use Trilogy to get the nice warm low end and the +z3ta to get those lovely dirty cruchy basses i love. Those two are a must for me.
I also use absynth and the FM8 for those complex textures but still need time to get used to the FM8. I suspect it will be one of my favourites when i get into it.
The luxonix ones I'm thinking of pack everything into 32 meg, saving you a heap of hard drive space and faffing around with sampler patches, and they're romplers. Synths tax your CPU, which is generally a much scarcer resource than memory or hard drive space. Sniffing at instruments just because they're "just romplers" still doesn't make sense to me, but go ahead, you're far from alone in this department.i don't like romplers as they are a unnecessary strain on computer. if i had jus the samples i can just load up the ones i want into sampler. They also tend to take up huge amounts of hard drive space. The whole sample vs synth thing doesn't even come into it.
Last edited by rounser; 08-05-2007 at 11:47 PM.
Romplers are just another way of packaging the wav files
and i have to agree with the atmosphere comment, but only because the filters were not accessible via automation from the sequencer...
and its not the easiest to program.
z3ta! its the only softsynth i use.