how to improve this section...

[The Overfiend]

and please dont use the expression "regardless of what scott says" as your indicating that i somehow insinuate what im typing is gospel. It's not, its just the voice of experience within these forums. Ive seen this exact thread practically many times over the years, just with different usernames doing the typing :)

I stated such terminology to point out I disagreed specifically with your text.

In regards to the text written by Dirty Bass, I would think that whatever tasks are to be assigned to the new Mod would appointed by the admin themselves.
There are suggestions which we as a group may or could give, but ultimately those kind of decisions would made by them.
I was just stating that contributing, through the execution of strategies, organizational objectives, and the mission of this forum, are or should be the standards by which the forum could be managed.

[eyeswithoutaface]

I stated such terminology to point out I disagreed specifically with your text.

In regards to the text written by Dirty Bass, I would think that whatever tasks are to be assigned to the new Mod would appointed by the admin themselves.
There are suggestions which we as a group may or could give, but ultimately those kind of decisions would made by them.
I was just stating that contributing, through the execution of strategies, organizational objectives, and the mission of this forum, are or should be the standards by which the forum could be managed.

thats fair enough, could of been worded somewhat better i thought that's all....

as for the rest, nah man, a mod should be here just to make sure things are ticking over nicely, sort out any disagreements etc, not run the place and be certainly shouldnt expected to review every single track posted or even be given certain instructions, there are protocol to follow of course but i think this is all getting way over the top now