Quote Originally Posted by MARK EG View Post
exactly shapehopper ya hit the nail on the head. it needs to be said precisely what style i will be playing. saying 'technodrome classics' is ridiculous. i played from like 93-2000 in the technodrome - a massive span of music. shame no-one actually asked me about this set before putting me on the flyer. i would never have agreed to it without an agreement on the style AND a mention about it on the flyer... i don't want the ravers to be let down, anyone who knows me knows that.....

hmm.. i'm sure you can feel my pain here mate... ppl will feel let down and you know what - i'll get the blame.. shit sound, crap time but so much love put into the set and for what???

well at least there was a few ppl in that crowd who seemed to like the last few moments when the bass came on. but damn, it should have been so much better.

look i just wanna say, this WONT happen again. trust me guys, i wont let you down again... if it says classics, it will say EXACTLY the style. if it doesnt', dont go.
Nothing you can do about it really. The promoters should be clear about it - end of. Clarkee played nu style dutch gabber in the techno room and played old skool bergian techno stuff in the old skool room. Which were different to what was advertised. I remember mick supposed to have played a classic set at vibealite couple of years ago and played hardstyle. When I asked him at the end he said no one told him to play classics! I know you were told but it should have said techno/trance with the years involved (ie 93-97 hard trance classics). Would have been clearer for you and us anyway.

Good to see you & chrissi again tho mate.

BTW - what was that last tune you played? Was a beast!