Welcome to the Blackout Audio Techno Forums :: Underground Network.
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 1 to 20 of 52
Thread: mp3 or not - don't you hear it?
Hybrid View
-
30-03-2008, 04:33 PM #1Ultimate Freak
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- umop apisdn
- Posts
- 1,682
mp3 or not - don't you hear it?
-
30-03-2008, 06:56 PM #2BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- PHX AZ USA
- Posts
- 2,673
-
31-03-2008, 10:12 AM #3BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- In the sky eating clouds
- Posts
- 4,428
both are mp3.
-
31-03-2008, 05:17 PM #4Ultimate Freak
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 1,356
the point is to identify which one is the better quality, you retard.
Originally Posted by massplanck
-
31-03-2008, 05:21 PM #5BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- In the sky eating clouds
- Posts
- 4,428
Wow. Did you figure that out all by yourself?
Isnt calling the site mp3ornot.com stupid is when the answer to the question isnt whether the file is an mp3 or not?
The whole mp3 sound quailty debate doesnt revolving around 192 mp3s vs 320 mp3s. Its CD, Vinyl, Wav whatever vs mp3.
Engage your own brain retard.Last edited by massplanck; 31-03-2008 at 05:30 PM.
-
02-04-2008, 12:06 PM #6Ultimate Freak
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 1,356
figured. Originally Posted by massplanck
-
31-03-2008, 05:24 PM #7Deceptacon
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Dublin
- Posts
- 9,653
-
31-03-2008, 05:35 PM #8BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- dublin
- Posts
- 2,781
comeon barry ...we all know u listened, failed, then clicked the only other option
Originally Posted by rhythmtech
-
31-03-2008, 05:24 PM #9Deceptacon
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Dublin
- Posts
- 9,653
fairly audible differance thru the mackies
-
02-04-2008, 09:17 AM #10Parsnip
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Bangalore, India
- Posts
- 15,336
Fairly audible difference with my shitty £5 headphones through this on-board sound card. Originally Posted by rhythmtech
-
31-03-2008, 05:25 PM #11BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- In the sky eating clouds
- Posts
- 4,428
There is a massive difference. I was expecting WAV vs high quality MP3 or something.
Not much of challenge if its 320 vs 128 now is it?.Last edited by massplanck; 31-03-2008 at 05:31 PM.
-
31-03-2008, 05:30 PM #12BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- dublin
- Posts
- 2,781
320 vs 128 .... piece of piss
-
31-03-2008, 05:37 PM #13BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- In the sky eating clouds
- Posts
- 4,428
Why doesnt someone do a WAV vs 320k vs FLAC version. ie a real challenge?
-
02-04-2008, 09:18 AM #14Parsnip
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Bangalore, India
- Posts
- 15,336
Erm... Originally Posted by massplanck
What's the point of doing WAV v's FLAC?
FLAC is lossless, so there is no difference between WAV and FLAC.
-
02-04-2008, 09:34 AM #15BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- In the sky eating clouds
- Posts
- 4,428
Originally Posted by TechMouse
Erm. I said WAV vs 320 vs FLAC.
Which meant high quality mp3 vs the best formats.
And TM seeing you are being so pedantic today there is a massive difference
between WAV and FLAC. The size. ;)
-
02-04-2008, 10:04 AM #16Parsnip
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Bangalore, India
- Posts
- 15,336
Yeah, but you can't really hear size can you. Originally Posted by massplanck
Not quite sure how your blind comparison would work.
-
02-04-2008, 11:16 AM #17It is inevitable.
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- not sure.
- Posts
- 12,277
You can yeah. I hear Rhythm tech has a tiny penis. Originally Posted by TechMouse
Bás Ar An Impireacht
-
02-04-2008, 05:19 PM #18BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- NJ, USA
- Posts
- 4,066
I did a WAV vs 320kbit thing here once. Can't remember if anyone bit. Did it on another board with bits from "Hotel California" as the test, since it wasn't a techno board. All the people who absolutely knew they'd be able to spot a difference were, after requesting I waste the time putting loops together, amazingly silent once that had occurred. Originally Posted by massplanck
Either way, it's probably Radiohead's fault. ;)A person belonging to one or more Order is just as likely to carry a flag of the counter-establishment as the flag of the establishment, just as long as it is a flag. --P.D.
-
02-04-2008, 05:25 PM #19BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- In the sky eating clouds
- Posts
- 4,428
do it again! please Originally Posted by tocsin
-
02-04-2008, 05:55 PM #20BOA Lifetime Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- NJ, USA
- Posts
- 4,066
I'll have to reupload tonight. I'll post a link when it's done.
A person belonging to one or more Order is just as likely to carry a flag of the counter-establishment as the flag of the establishment, just as long as it is a flag. --P.D.
Reply With Quote
