Welcome to the Blackout Audio Techno Forums :: Underground Network.
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 44

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,480

    Default

    explain logically how it is lame for someone to use a sample that they actually took the time and cost to get clearance

  2. #2
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,057

    Default

    Back to the Clones track, has anyone else actually heard it? It's really not great. Not so much sampling the tracks as literally just playing them together. I was really curious when I saw the description, but totally let down when I heard it...

  3. #3
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by teknorich View Post
    Back to the Clones track, has anyone else actually heard it? It's really not great. Not so much sampling the tracks as literally just playing them together. I was really curious when I saw the description, but totally let down when I heard it...
    If this is the case I retract my comment about it being lame.

    Just to be clear I was referring to him having the record pulled (if he was the culprit) Not using the sample. Shit - I own M_Nus Orange and rocked the hell out of it when it came out.

    But back to the Clones record, did any of the other clones records get clearance to sample those tracks?

    I dunno if it was something hot and it got pulled, it just kind of sounds weak to pull it. Unless they're somehow making boatloads of cash off the records. But is anyone doing that in this industry?
    Last edited by TheRev; 08-04-2008 at 04:27 AM.
    The Rev
    Ordained in the Ministry of Techno
    www.gothamgrooves.com
    www.myspace.com/therevufi

  4. #4
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheRev View Post
    If this is the case I retract my comment about it being lame.

    Just to be clear I was referring to him having the record pulled (if he was the culprit) Not using the sample. Shit - I own M_Nus Orange and rocked the hell out of it when it came out.

    But back to the Clones record, did any of the other clones records get clearance to sample those tracks?

    I dunno if it was something hot and it got pulled, it just kind of sounds weak to pull it. Unless they're somehow making boatloads of cash off the records. But is anyone doing that in this industry?
    haha classic, make your mind up fella

    i love how people just fail miserably to see things from the artists point of view in these things. This isnt just 2 shitty records that havent sold anyway being ripped, these are 2 massive tracks that are actually a source of income for someone, and i dare say if both were re-released again now they would sell bucketloads again. So there's nothing lame at all about someone like Hawtin getting a release stopped that blatently rips him in such a way. It makes perfect logical sense to me that the person who made the original music should still withold the right to decide how and when that music can are used in an instance such as this one.

    I know the idea of Clones is it is a bootleg label, and i love a bootleg as much as the next guy, but that doesnt mean that the person being bootlegged shouldnt at least have the right to do something about it if they want to. Wether they actually can or not is a different matter, and obviously being at the level he is, it's not going to be hard for someone like Richie Hawtin to get his way im sure. As an example, i recently got directed to a torrent site where someone had uploaded one of my records for open download. Absolutely nothing i can do about it. The irony is, if the people who wanted the record had used the brain cells they have and emailed me i'd of sent them a vinyl copy if i have any spare, certainly mastered WAV's if not.

    It's not always so black and white in this game unfortunately

    fair enough if the record is actually good and you like it, but to say the original composer is lame for protecting their own interests is just crazy talk unfortunately
    Last edited by eyeswithoutaface; 08-04-2008 at 07:26 PM.

  5. #5
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eyeswithoutaface View Post
    haha classic, make your mind up fella
    Not really flip flopping - I was under the impression that they had done more than just layer the two tracks.

    See my thinking is that if an artist makes some signficant changes to a track and such and added something new and unique. It's a different story.

    In an ideal world - yeah the original artist should likely get paid if there is a lot of $$$ involved. But I was always under the impression that lables like Clones are limited pressings.

    I mean if this one shoudl be pulled, why not the rest of them?
    The Rev
    Ordained in the Ministry of Techno
    www.gothamgrooves.com
    www.myspace.com/therevufi

  6. #6
    Deceptacon
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    9,653

    Default

    yup.. have it here.. its ok.. not a patch on some previous clones.

  7. #7
    Supreme Freak
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    890

    Default

    F**k Hawtin.
    It's the f**king underground scene, "do what ya want", "sample what ya want" an "play what ya want".

    Get on with it and stop f**king moaning!

  8. #8
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by A.P. View Post
    F**k Hawtin.
    It's the f**king underground scene, "do what ya want", "sample what ya want" an "play what ya want".

    Get on with it and stop f**king moaning!
    haha, yeah, that's easily said and done when your at the level the likes of ourselves are at, but like i said in my post, you have to see this from the person involveds point of view. The difference between the actual business incentives involved in what the likes of Hawtin and company do/play/release and the likes of ourselves is to be fair, insane. With the releases in question, your talking thousands of dollars. No one would let that go if it was happening to them, that includes me and you also.

    @ baz haha yeah, i know what you mean, but maybe he doesnt think Clones is a decent label, and like i say, the tracks in question will have and still could probably quite easily generate him a few thousand dollars or more, i know i would certainly do the same

  9. #9
    Ultimate Freak
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by A.P. View Post
    F**k Hawtin.
    It's the f**king underground scene, "do what ya want", "sample what ya want" an "play what ya want".

    Get on with it and stop f**king moaning!
    word. that's the truth right there.
    its worth remembering that on Substance Abuse, Hawtin's finest track by some distance, he himself sampled a vocal from Mr. Kirk's Nightmare by 4 Hero, which in turn was sampled from elsewhere.
    there is no way on earth that Hawtin cleared that sample, and probably still hasn't to this day.

    this is the underground motherfcukers, catch me if you can....

    if someone sampled my shit and was making a whole load of money from it, I'd want my cut. but the record we're talking about here is a techno record so there's very little chance whoever's made it has made more than a couple of hundred quid from it.
    Last edited by Microdot; 10-04-2008 at 04:14 PM.

  10. #10
    Deceptacon
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    9,653

    Default

    i can see scotts point.. hawtin really has got the right to stop this..

    but for fuks sake.. its clones.. i'd be honoured!!!

    maybe hawtin thinks he's mariah carey?

  11. #11
    Prince Of Warthogs
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    2,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhythmtech View Post
    i can see scotts point.. hawtin really has got the right to stop this..

    but for fuks sake.. its clones.. i'd be honoured!!!

    maybe hawtin thinks he's mariah carey?

    dunno about being honoured
    i'm not much of a clones fan tbh
    the odd one maybe....

    i'm sure rich tea wasn't sitting there thinking oh wow! i'm on clones!
    now i can get that holiday in bermuda i've always wanted.
    love your mum

  12. #12
    BOA Mod
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    10,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhythmtech View Post
    i can see scotts point.. hawtin really has got the right to stop this..

    but for fuks sake.. its clones.. i'd be honoured!!!

    maybe hawtin thinks he's mariah carey?
    its more probable that if he DID pull it, then commercial reasons were more important than anything.

  13. #13
    Deceptacon
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    9,653

    Default

    he shoulda been.

    clones is a smashing label. you fail.

  14. #14
    It is inevitable.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    not sure.
    Posts
    12,277

    Default

    Utter bollox if you ask me. I love sampling, ripping shite apart and making it even more shite for shits and giggles. Bollox to Richie "the doo" Hawtin, this is techno, all about recycling music. Not pop, lawsuits and hissy fits.
    Bás Ar An Impireacht

  15. #15
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DannyBlack View Post
    Utter bollox if you ask me. I love sampling, ripping shite apart and making it even more shite for shits and giggles. Bollox to Richie "the doo" Hawtin, this is techno, all about recycling music. Not pop, lawsuits and hissy fits.
    well, that's just a nice ideal these days unfortunately. The sooner more people realise that things do actually turn into a business at some point, the better

    i know for a fact everyone one of us on here would do the same thing if we had records out of such stature, which generated the level of income they have/do/would and someone was ripping them in such a fashion. Any of you who say you wouldnt are lying through what teeth you may have left

  16. #16
    Deceptacon
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    9,653

    Default

    its a tough call.

    i really cant see how it would affect sales of either of hawtins records anyway.. but as you say there comes a point where it becomes business.

    but there are plenty of people doing bootlegs and a lot of them are bigish names.. even clones is owned by hertz.

  17. #17
    It is inevitable.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    not sure.
    Posts
    12,277

    Default

    As long as I have a bit of money for cheap whores and even cheaper whiskey, Id be alright.
    Bás Ar An Impireacht

  18. #18
    It is inevitable.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    not sure.
    Posts
    12,277

    Default

    I'm safe in the knowledge that NO ONE is ever gonna sample my shit, because it is just that hahahahahahahahahahaha! :lol:
    Bás Ar An Impireacht

  19. #19
    BOA Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    LS6 + fuct
    Posts
    3,008

    Default

    I'm waiting outside your bathroom door with a mic to sample your shit as we speak. Take the idea of the tune made entirely from farts to a new level...
    Pure F*ckin' Noize Terror...

  20. #20
    It is inevitable.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    not sure.
    Posts
    12,277

    Default

    hahahaha thought I heard someone! Could you pass me the bog roll mate, I got a right struggle on me hands here!
    Bás Ar An Impireacht

 

 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top