808 State- Cubik.

[Lag]

techno artists sampling other techno artists
how sad
like hes retarded enough to be unable to play 4 tones on a synth

[krimewave]

techno artists sampling other techno artists
how sad
like hes retarded enough to be unable to play 4 tones on a synth

shut up you fcuking spastic

[Lag]

shut up you fcuking spastic

did i hurt some con artists feelings? aww

[force]

did i hurt some con artists feelings? aww

No mate, you just made a genuinely 'twatty' comment.

Ever heard of remixes/bootlegs?

The fact is, Cubik was a big, big tune back in the day and i can fully appreciate sampling the main riff and dropping it into a techno set, if only for the buzz and excitement it would solicit on the dancefloor amongst the punters old enough to remember it the first time round.

But hey, if you dont get it...:)

[force]

Look lag, you're perfectly entitled to your opinion, just as others are entitled to theirs.
There is no right/wrong (within reason) there's just music and what floats others boats, won't necessarily float your's.

You talk about name calling, but may i just remind you of this.

like hes retarded enough to be unable to play 4 tones on a synth

You implied a couple of very good techno producers are 'retards' on the basis of one track you disagreed with the concept of.
You could have just said, Nah, don't like this at all, i think its cheating. But instead you chose to be offensive and thats when thing got a bit heated.

That's why i came down pretty hard on you but i'm sure you wont lose any sleep over it.

[krimewave]

did i hurt some con artists feelings? aww

I doubt it. all the con artists I know rarely frequent internet forums, they are generally too busy putting their latest scams into practice.

the point I was trying to make is that you're just a spastic who should shut up because you're opinions are infantile, uneducated and misinformed.
pretty self explanatory from my original post really.

[SlavikSvensk]

now where does that say you are not entitled to an opinion?

basically what you did was libalous - you accused him of being a thief without prior knowledge to the situation.

if thats how you choose to air your opinions then fine.. but dont be surprised when you raise a few hairs.

yeah got to agree, though i woudln't go so far as to say it's libel...just not very friendly or respectful

...big difference between saying "i don't care for it when people use such-and-such samples. to me it's not what i look for or want to see in the genre"

and

techno artists sampling other techno artists
how sad
like hes retarded enough to be unable to play 4 tones on a synth

people need to be a bit more careful about what they write in life sometimes

[rhythmtech]

yeah got to agree, though i woudln't go so far as to say it's libel...just not very friendly or respectful

...big difference between saying "i don't care for it when people use such-and-such samples. to me it's not what i look for or want to see in the genre"

have a look at the "he is a thief" bit. i think that qualifies as libel?

[SlavikSvensk]

have a look at the "he is a thief" bit. i think that qualifies as libel?

didn't see that. but if someone says a person is a thief, and it's not true or there's no proof under the applicable laws, it's libel under UK law. maybe US too, i don't know.

but if he didn't say "you're a thief," then it's not libel even if implied. then it's just disrespectful.