Allen and heath mixers have got great sound quality but i do still prefer my pioneer djm400. As everyone has said the allen and heaths always seem really fiddly.
Welcome to the Blackout Audio Techno Forums :: Underground Network.
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 21 to 31 of 31
Hybrid View
-
24-09-2008, 01:50 PM #1Junior Freak
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Posts
- 50
-
01-10-2008, 05:45 AM #2BOA Newbie
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 15
Well you might not like A&H but at least you're honest
Originally Posted by xes
-
14-10-2008, 04:49 PM #3BOA Newbie
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 22
I've had a xone 62 since 2002 and haven't had any problems with it at all.
-
14-10-2008, 10:28 PM #4Junior Freak
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Posts
- 50
ive just bought one myself...fiddly as **** but once you get it...your in there...filters are slick as you'd expect and the midi controls need a bit of practice to get to the level you want to be at...but its all about the sound..this shit is ,made for techno!!!!!
-
27-01-2009, 11:27 PM #5Ultimate Freak
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- Liverpool
- Posts
- 1,029
i got an a+h and i can see why people don't like em but the sound is absolute quality. i have it running into my computer via a crappy NOISY behringer europap piece of shit and when I record on 48khz it sounds clearer, crisper and generally awesome!
That does it for me at the end of the day. That was what persuaded me above the pioneer djm 800.
Oh and I probably stand alone when I say this but i like the 4 eq's.
horses for courses though
-
28-01-2009, 05:39 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 757
Never been a fan myself. I'm still in love with the Pioneer EQ's!
-
26-03-2009, 12:58 PM #7Junior Freak
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 97
Played couple of times on it but i still stick on my DJM800 no matter what, when and how.
Reply With Quote