learn the rules. then break the rules.
our entire genre is only in existance because of sampling. just be creative in how you do it.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
learn the rules. then break the rules.
our entire genre is only in existance because of sampling. just be creative in how you do it.
I don't agree with encouragement to steal and use other peoples drum patterns etc in a tutorial. I agree with encouraging people to be original. They can do whatever they want but don't teach them bad habits lol
Techno. Drum and Bass.
Yeah but what one person would class as 1, someone else could class as 2. Even Vanilla Ice argued that adding one note to the bassline of Under Pressure made it something original.
Also, drum&bass and its predecessors may have been based on sampling other music, but techno wasn't. That's just a myth perpetuated by people who like to steal loops from other people's music :p.
Last edited by Smear; 01-11-2008 at 07:50 AM. Reason: Tiny grammar ****-up
well adding 1 note to a bassline is completly differant to chopping an audio file into slices, sticking them in a sampler and using the single slices as drum hits.Yeah but what one person would class as 1, someone else could class as 2. Even Vanilla Ice argued that adding one note to the bassline of Under Pressure made it something original.
and to be honest about it ive lifted loops myself in the past. especially when i was starting and wasnt to confident about my own stuff. but like i said its not what you do its the way that you do it.
well techno has been so bastardised thru the years that it doesnt really make a differance anymore.Also, drum&bass and its predecessors may have been based on sampling other music, but techno wasn't.
look, this topic has been done to death here and no-one will ever agree so just do what you do and if people like it then great.
How about stealing an arrangement?
To my knowledge there is only ONE arrangement that has been at the forefront of defending its own copyright.. and thats John Cage's 4' 33''.. its as simple as this, how do you copyright an arrangement of nothing... and thats because to play nothing, you cannot change a thing, becuase nothing is there to change... its a real mind bender!!!!! and been succesfully defended in the court twice i seem to remember.
drum patterns are a difficult one... breaks and standard drum patterns have been around for years - they are printed without refernce to an originator (AFAIK) and are available for robbing.
recordings of drum patterns are a different thing altogether. The copyright covers the song writer (rarely a drummer by origin) the performance (the drummer themselves) and recording copyright (the person/studio where the performance was recorded and possibly mastered)
And all this has to considered on top of the phrase "Prior Art" which covers such things as chords, scales, basic chord progressions etc.
Sampling, breaking, effecting and possibly re-pitching are perfectly acceptable ways of taking what is effectivly a sound and re-enginnering it.
Sampling, reversing and leaving as is becomes not just un-original but also makes a producer into a dreadful shit.
:lol: