
Originally Posted by
Jay Pace
hey man
Yeah, +1 on st johns comments - this is much more interesting than schranz.
Complex patterns, cool elements - not just endless WHUMPA WHUMPA filling up the whole space. Don't mind a bit of schranz but cannae cope with more than a few tracks meself...
Production wise need to fill in the space a bit more, and although stereo and width is pretty irrelevant for schranz (mono mega-rigged up party music) it would make the track sound fuller. You could extend a bit lower and a bit higher, make the bass deeper and the highs sparkier and use stereo to give stuff a bit more room and fill stuff up. Again its the perception of loads of elements more than loads of elements (nicely put on that mr john) - more about making the sounds you use count than piling stuff on until its sounds full. To make this more full you'd need to make more use of compression on the individual tracks and the overall mix, use reverb on the individual tracks to create a sense of space and EQ stuff to give each bit a bit more room to smack with.
nice work dude.