yeah mistakes are bound to happen in a mag when things arent properly delegated and one person is doing the bulk of the main editing work. structure is the key here i think, not only in the mag content, but also the way it is run. hopefully this will get sorted in the next issue. once again, sorry bout that k, and to all that gave me some reviews. you can see how there would be a chance of this happening without a clear mag plan and structure can't you eh.