Owen steals the winner

[C.O.Prodigy]

good game yea and united probs did deserve it but where did the 7 minutes of injury time come from????

we'll just keep playing till united get another to make mr ferguson happy then ill blow my whistle 10 seconds after

only at old trafford

yeah. the ref did add an unusual amount of time at the end. It kinda puts a sour note a a great derby game and a great performance from fletcher and bellamy.

a fair result would be a draw.. although except for the time there is nothing wrong with owen's finishing..
top stuff..

[Numeric]

yeah. the ref did add an unusual amount of time at the end. It kinda puts a sour note a a great derby game and a great performance from fletcher and bellamy.

a fair result would be a draw.. although except for the time there is nothing wrong with owen's finishing..
top stuff..

lets not get it twisted, united deserved the win, we were by far the better team in the second half, city were truly out-classed for large periods, shay given kept them in the game, if it wasn't for some awful goal keeping from foster and insanity from rio, united won have won this fixture easily

and as for the extra time, city spent about two or three minutes celebrating their late equaliser, they ran up the time, it was their own fault

giggs was incredible again yesterday, as was fletcher, but the jury is still well and out regarding foster

[weekender_veteran]

great thread title!! Steal being the operative word!!!!

[C.O.Prodigy]

lets not get it twisted, united deserved the win, we were by far the better team in the second half, city were truly out-classed for large periods, shay given kept them in the game, if it wasn't for some awful goal keeping from foster and insanity from rio, united won have won this fixture easily

and as for the extra time, city spent about two or three minutes celebrating their late equaliser, they ran up the time, it was their own fault

giggs was incredible again yesterday, as was fletcher, but the jury is still well and out regarding foster

Ok, they did deserve the win but from a neutral stand point the time added on was in favor of united. To be fair man city could have defended the last minutes better and could have kept it together but they didn't and they got punished. Great derby. Best goal of the lot, Bellamy's second goal.

[Numeric]

aye, bellamy's goal was a stunner

apparently, on match of the day 2 they broke down the added time and, according to them, the ref got it right, the amount of time he added was justified due to city's goal celebration and the substitution, and this is the bbc we're talking about here, they have no love for united, so if they're saying that the time added on was correct, it must be

[C.O.Prodigy]

apparently, on match of the day 2 they broke down the added time and, according to them, the ref got it right, the amount of time he added was justified due to city's goal celebration and the substitution, and this is the bbc we're talking about here, they have no love for united, so if they're saying that the time added on was correct, it must be

That's really interesting. I believe you. I guess if the ref's use this logic of time keeping and apply it to every other game in the premiership and to other fifa games on a regular bases, then I guess that would be fair. Otherwise it is what it is.
Great photo btw. I'm stealing it. :)

[DarkYoung]

aye, bellamy's goal was a stunner

apparently, on match of the day 2 they broke down the added time and, according to them, the ref got it right, the amount of time he added was justified due to city's goal celebration and the substitution, and this is the bbc we're talking about here, they have no love for united, so if they're saying that the time added on was correct, it must be

actually it was one second over time.

[Numeric]

actually it was one second over time.

:lol: i stand corrected

[DarkYoung]

:lol: i stand corrected

well given human error. im sure we can allow a second either side.