just a heads up lads.. i have a new EP out soon. called "the outsider".
its gonna be savage!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
just a heads up lads.. i have a new EP out soon. called "the outsider".
its gonna be savage!
shameless as in he has no shame, or should be ashamed but is not... u dig???
and rage it isn't, but it's no secret there is no love lost between james and i...
TBH "the outsider" (my one) was called that BECAUSE of Jimmy ruskin, karl regis and those cunts being so snobby and elitist! so yea i dunno it just kinda grates on my nerves when you get this fool coming out with a ****ing PAS remix of all things, of a song with a title which i feel was VERY identifiably GUNJACK... i mean i remember UMEK, VARELLA, SHUFFLEMASTER, PEPO, RUSH, JEFF etc all giving me love for the originality of the artwork (by japanese pop artist shinrock) and original hybrid sound of that record... so yea it sucks to have the snyde techolite crowd like ruskin and them pretend your shit never happened
See, what you should have done is spoken to James or whatever label released the record, explain to them that you'd already come up with the concept and at the very least would like some acknowledgements.
Instead, you've gone ape shit, insulted all the people involved and spouted a load of crap to a bunch of people that probably don't care enough to do anything about it, which isn't really constructive at all now is it?
Damn, so i cant call my next release The murder of Crws then.
BALLS!
The murder of ducks it is then.
Just another 'look at me' thread
Man, God is gonna be pissed at me for my track. I stole the name of one of the 4 horsemen...
Bás Ar An Impireacht
Bullshit tread. get a ****ing life man
The concept of being an "outsider" is hardly an original idea.
Ruskin probably did it because he wanted to. SImple as that, even if he saw a Gunjack record with it on, he probably thought, Who will give a crap anyway, it`s not a concept that can be copyrighted.
He doesn`t need the prop up, his career is doing fine, he`s a big name in techno.
He probably doesn`t think you exist, because you might possibly be irrelevant to him.
Who really gives a ****, it`s an ep name with an un-original title name regardless of who used it.
Pointless thread, tainted with bitterness?
I am not here but my ghost still lingers
wow...two techno producers both decide to use the same cliched title for their ep.
here's a thought: who f**king cares?
The law is not the private property of lawyers, nor is justice the exclusive province of judges and juries. In the final analysis, true justice is not a matter of courts and law books, but of a commitment in each of us to liberty and mutual respect. - Jimmy Carter
Maybe all the names, titles...etc in techno could be more original so then when were repeated it will be more noticeable...
I`m waiting for the "Stonking great cancerous testicle EP"
Or
"Title completely unrelated to the music EP"
I am not here but my ghost still lingers
nice avatar mate!
If your original take was shit, can we still nick the name?
ooh ooh
What about
"Spit the dummy EP"
I am not here but my ghost still lingers
Jon Rundell had a release out the same time as me last year both called Future Funk but I wouldn't call him cunt for having a release the same name as his release it didn't bother me at tall
calling someone a cunt for having a release the same name as your release is a bit bitter & petty it's a waste of enegry in fact it's pathetic!
All u need is a good ear for music!