Quote Originally Posted by Will View Post
Man U have heavily invested as well, just over a longer period of time.
There are some major differences, which I shouldn't have to explain.

But, basically, United generated money over a long period of time from their own success, whilst remaining remaining to be one of the cheapest grounds in the league to visit (This has changed recently because of the Glazers though and I think we're now about 7th or 8th most expensive).

If you believe United have bought success, what exactly have Liverpool bought in the same period of time?
Since Fergie has been in charge, United have spent less money on players than Liverpool.