Originally Posted by
gunjack
some of us are trying. it's tough though because people seem so determined to keep recycling a prototype that want cold years ago. i am not saying we abandon the format completely mind you, just that we try harder to be a bit more interesting than 4 and a half minutes of hard percussion, with a 4x4 feel and some "downwards" synth on top.
i mean people from certain generations couldn't even tell you about juan atkins much less marvin gaye etc.
here goes a story for you.
i was in atlanta, recording the first omerta single at matt's place. we go out to eat and i slide a marvin gaye instrumentals CD into the player. i am vibing out on the deep motown vibes and all of a sudden matt yanks out the CD and says: "sorry i can't take this music"... he then proceeds to put on the latest "underground hip hop mixtape" (hasaan insane) with biggie bootlegs etc and the first song that comes on is just a 16 bar looped sample OF THE VERY SAME MARVIN GAYE TUNE THAT WAS PLAYING WHEN HE POPPED THE DISC OUT!
this is the mentality that ****s us up. people who say "i dunno, i just play what i like" when you ask them about the roots of techno.
closed minded, genre centric, bosh bosh heads who don't know the history of this music and are, therefore, doomed to repeat it.
or outsiders who call dark tunes "funky" and come visit forums like this just to ask if the sound is "out of style"
we got to LEAD the pack not just be satisfied with something that sounds like something else that is already on wax!
i understand that new producers rely on emulation. i was the same when i started - "wow that could be a downwards tune!" (that type of mentality) but how long does it take to get past the novelty and start making tunes that actually cross boundaries or erase them altogether.
i have mad respect for detroit heads for example but they are just as guilty of getting to a certain level musically and being content to stay there for years and years!
GJ