same old story.we batter you,but dont put the ball in the net.you had one chance and scored.thats the diffrence.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
same old story.we batter you,but dont put the ball in the net.you had one chance and scored.thats the diffrence.
You have to create a chance to score.
your best chances were when Edwin was making a cock of himself, other than that you hardly created anything clear cut, lots of pressure but nothing to really trouble our defence which was awesome, what happened to Torres? :lol:
that was the difference between champions and pretenders yesterday...
anyone see the head to head stats for the top four over the past few years? Liverpool are way behind United, Chelsea and Arsenal, until they learn to beat the better teams regular Liverpool will never come anywhere near the title :)
Numeric
im happy, very happy!! come on united...we didnt just win we destroyed liverpools 100% home record.....hahaha!! get in!!
Ho Ho Ho Merry Tevezmas!! :xtongue:
Be Lucky!
please define 'batter' :lol:
you applied some pressure but Edwin was hardly worked...
Numeric
you're living in dreamland son.
your midfield was bossed by Utd's throughout the game.
both teams had a couple of clear cut chances each. difference is Utd put one of theirs in the onion bag.
sc***ers had alot more possesion than Utd in the 2nd half, but that's to be expected from a team chasing the game.
the main point this game underlined for me, is that liverpool simply aren't good enough to win the prem.
who knows though, if they sold kewell, they could maybe raise half a mill or so to go towards new signings....
I wouldnt say you bossed the midfield lad. If you "bossed" it as you say, how come possesion and territorial advantage was in our favour.
That would suggest that we had the ball more often that not in your midfield, final third area but could not produce the final ball to capitalise on all the pressure we had been applying.
Hargreaves just sat infront if the defence all day scooping up all the shit crosses and long punted passes/balls that we were delivering. The only thing he contributed was the efffort that went over the bar.
Numeric, Torres did have the better of the first half lad, you could see your back four was nervous when he got on the ball... That time he knocked it past Vidic, Square chin, brought him down purposfully which should of been another booking.
I cant say anyone on either teams had a amazing game and id be surprised (actually some one will) if you can say a particular player stood out..
it was a shit game...
Liverpool need to get rid of. Riise, Kewell, Jewboy, Kuyt, Voronin,
Am dreaming, and it is dream that we can poach Berbatov off tottenham in the new year or end of season, him and torres up front would be class
"His Armband Said He was Red
Torres Torres,!!!
Youll Never Walk Alone it Said
Torres Torres!!!
We bought the lad from sunny Spain,
He'll get the ball, he'll score again
Fernando Torres!!!
LIVERPOOLS NUMBER 9"
at the end of the day united won at anfield, all the stats dont mean anything...if liverpool played better they should have won but they didnt, united did!
:xsmile:
Be Lucky!
Crouch should be playing ahead of Kuyt anyway, Torres would have alot more success playing off of him and just Crouch's presence causes problems for defenders.
liverpool's midfield was rendered almost completely ineffectual, therefore it would be safe to say that Utd bossed the midfield.
I could deffo say one player stood out in this game.
Rio Ferdinand was immense, cementing his reputation as the best centre half in the league.
dude should be england captain imo.