time stretching a full track

[DannyBlack]

Non time stretched track:llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Time stretching does to a track: l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l (snip snip)

time streched track: lililililililililililililiilililililililililililil ililililililililililililililililililililililili

DON'T DO IT!

[rhythmtech]

Non time stretched track:llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Time stretching does to a track: l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l (snip snip)

time streched track: lililililililililililililiilililililililililililil ililililililililililililililililililililililili

DON'T DO IT!

depends on the algorhythm danny

for instance nuendo has an amazing algo for timestretching, but you have to select it in prefs because the standard one is shit.

just wondering is there better.. ie the ableton algorhythms?

[DannyBlack]

depends on the algorhythm danny

for instance nuendo has an amazing algo for timestretching, but you have to select it in prefs because the standard one is shit.

just wondering is there better.. ie the ableton algorhythms?

agreed, but you can always hear the time stretch. Think about when the track is most vulnerable- the break down. I guess test it first, but im sceptical.

[rhythmtech]

agreed, but you can always hear the time stretch.

i dont know about that danny.. i use time-stretchinging in every track.. every time you use an audio file, a loop, or a sample you're essentially time-stretching it. a good program shouldnt make it obvious unless you use the wrong settings, remember there are specific settings for beats, tones etc.

my problem doesnt really lie in whether to time-stretch or not, more in which program will give me the very very best results.

[tonyc2002]

this is supposed to be the daddy but its pro tools only i think :(

http://www.serato.com/pitchntime-le

*edit, its available for logic too

[DannyBlack]

i dont know about that danny.. i use time-stretchinging in every track.. every time you use an audio file, a loop, or a sample you're essentially time-stretching it.

Essentially yes, but indirectly. I only really use it for vocals and little blips and bloops but never a whole track- did it a few times with loops befier I made my own and it just sound poop.

I'm curious though, why an extra 2-3bpm? Can you not just up the tempo a smidge?

[rhythmtech]

Essentially yes, but indirectly. I only really use it for vocals and little blips and bloops but never a whole track- did it a few times with loops befier I made my own and it just sound poop.

what program did you use?

I'm curious though, why an extra 2-3bpm? Can you not just up the tempo a smidge

its the overall feel of the track. its at 140 at the moment i reckon it will sound better about 142ish.

to up the tempo id have to either time stretch 40 odd individual audio parts (which will take me till next year!!!) or else re-record 40 individual audio parts which is what i will probably do if ableton doesnt do the trick for me.

[DannyBlack]

what program did you use?



its the overall feel of the track. its at 140 at the moment i reckon it will sound better about 142ish.

to up the tempo id have to either time stretch 40 odd individual audio parts (which will take me till next year!!!) or else re-record 40 individual audio parts which is what i will probably do if ableton doesnt do the trick for me.

I started (all my editing really) with cool edit- moved onto adobe audition, recently I have been messing with FL slicer. Nothing hardcore or fancy, but making the best of what I had at the time.

140 bpm Baz, I like the sound of this already mate. Yeah, it is a real pain in the arse to speed up all the parts individually but no pain, no gain right?

Who are you adding the extra 2 beats per minute for though? I mean, once it goes on the platter it will be sped up or slowed down accordingly no?