Welcome to the Blackout Audio Techno Forums :: Underground Network.
Results 1 to 20 of 48

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Danny, interesting. My guess is you step the sines together with the kick to make the kick sub more? Many minimal producers use sine, but for making fat moving bass lines and moving subs its pretty thin and useless for my own taste. Sine is so limited, compression and EQ:ing basically does nothing for it, esp EQ does nothing. Anyone know where the sine-bass craze came from?

  2. #2
    Deceptacon
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    9,653

    Default

    the reason a sine is used is that you can pick your frequency to match the original kick (say 50hz) and absolutly no harmonics or additional musical information is added whatsoever.

    ... meaning that there is absolutly no need to eq it.

    (the reason eq doesnt work is because it is only one frequency - you could find the exact frequency and then eq will work but its pointless as all you could do is make the signal louder or quieter).
    Last edited by rhythmtech; 05-12-2010 at 03:26 PM.

  3. #3
    Junior Freak
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhythmtech View Post
    the reason a sine is used is that you can pick your frequency to match the original kick (say 50hz) and absolutly no harmonics or additional musical information is added whatsoever.

    ... meaning that there is absolutly no need to eq it.

    (the reason eq doesnt work is because it is only one frequency - you could find the exact frequency and then eq will work but its pointless as all you could do is make the signal louder or quieter).
    Exactly, that's my point when it comes to sine, hence I find it pretty bad and uninteresting to use for bass and dont get it why its such a "popular"concept and suggested by so many when people ask for ideas to bass.
    So again, anyone know where the sine craze came from? I'm genuinely interested.
    Last edited by Mattias_Fridell; 05-12-2010 at 03:41 PM.

  4. #4
    It is inevitable.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    not sure.
    Posts
    12,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mattias_Fridell View Post
    Danny, interesting. My guess is you step the sines together with the kick to make the kick sub more? Many minimal producers use sine, but for making fat moving bass lines and moving subs its pretty thin and useless for my own taste. Sine is so limited, compression and EQ:ing basically does nothing for it, esp EQ does nothing. Anyone know where the sine-bass craze came from?
    Basically yeah, pretty much. I'm not sure why I started using it tbh. I just wanted a fatter kick and a bit of rumble to make the kick and the sub kinda of blend together. My kick used to stand out too much. I've just developed it to my taste since the start.

    I don't find it limited really because I only use it for one thing really. I don't bother compressing it at all, I use subtle EQing. but other than that, not much else.
    Bás Ar An Impireacht

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top