how to improve this section...

[eyeswithoutaface]

Well regardless of what Scott has posted I beg to differ.
I do believe appointing a Mod that will review everything that is posted with an objective point of view will only add to the value of the "Production Forum."
Products, Companies, Movements, and such do not progress without providing reasoning for change. The expressed objection or request or want should display the interest in a new approach, therefore the consideration for something new to be appointed should not be ignored.

Take into consideration
"A belief that having continuous success in the same area makes you believe too much in your own power, which harms your creativity"

The challenge facing the administrators of this forum seeking to implement revolutionary change within the organization is to manage that change outside the straitjacket of the existing bureaucracy, procedures and norms.

man, i think your reading way too much into what is essentially a group of friends listening to each others music

and you cant expect a mod to review EVERY track that gets posted, thats just stupid and quite selfish. No one is under obligation to listen to and comment on everything, or anything for that matter, thats get posted. Which is why its a nice personal thing when people DO comment, with whatever they choose to put. With the amount of tracks getting posted here you'd be talking a few hours a day of someones time, and from my experience everyone here has other jobs and stuff they need to dedicate time too, and it wouldnt be nice if someone was starting to feel guilty about being a mod and not actually being ABLE to check everything that was posted.

and please dont use the expression "regardless of what scott says" as your indicating that i somehow insinuate what im typing is gospel. It's not, its just the voice of experience within these forums. Ive seen this exact thread practically many times over the years, just with different usernames doing the typing :)

[The Overfiend]

and please dont use the expression "regardless of what scott says" as your indicating that i somehow insinuate what im typing is gospel. It's not, its just the voice of experience within these forums. Ive seen this exact thread practically many times over the years, just with different usernames doing the typing :)

I stated such terminology to point out I disagreed specifically with your text.

In regards to the text written by Dirty Bass, I would think that whatever tasks are to be assigned to the new Mod would appointed by the admin themselves.
There are suggestions which we as a group may or could give, but ultimately those kind of decisions would made by them.
I was just stating that contributing, through the execution of strategies, organizational objectives, and the mission of this forum, are or should be the standards by which the forum could be managed.

[eyeswithoutaface]

I stated such terminology to point out I disagreed specifically with your text.

In regards to the text written by Dirty Bass, I would think that whatever tasks are to be assigned to the new Mod would appointed by the admin themselves.
There are suggestions which we as a group may or could give, but ultimately those kind of decisions would made by them.
I was just stating that contributing, through the execution of strategies, organizational objectives, and the mission of this forum, are or should be the standards by which the forum could be managed.

thats fair enough, could of been worded somewhat better i thought that's all....

as for the rest, nah man, a mod should be here just to make sure things are ticking over nicely, sort out any disagreements etc, not run the place and be certainly shouldnt expected to review every single track posted or even be given certain instructions, there are protocol to follow of course but i think this is all getting way over the top now