it's called dubstep isn't it?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
it's called dubstep isn't it?
WTF???? dubstep is EXACTLY like those movements... dubstep IS a movement that rose out of the ashes of garage and techno (!) the way techno rose from the ashes of p funk/industrial etc, the way that house came from the death of disco and the way disco came from the last days of fusion...
i mean i personally hate most typical "dubstep" tunes but there is no denying it is a valid musical movement and has opened many doors for producers like myself to reach more fans and take more musical risks...
snoop dogg begs to differ. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iOp-C1hQ8k
dubstep reached it`s peak already.
It doesn`t have the energy to be any bigger.
I don`t think it contains any advanced techniques either.
The general level of production quality is quite high for a music that has so much fire in it`s belly, but I would hardly say the techniques are any more advanced than what is happening in any genre.
It`s just another sub genre of music.
I like it a lot, but it`s not some amazing new undiscovered jewel.
Last edited by The_Laughing_Man; 23-04-2009 at 02:42 AM.
I am not here but my ghost still lingers
"dubstep", "brummy" techno etc has all lead us to the same fuking place.... MONGREL MUSIC. HYBRID MUSIC. music that doesn't depend on one subgenre or another... i had somebody call my new tunes "industrial break step" the other day and i had to tell him "for fuk's sake man,
can't we let go of these playground, pigeon-holing antics?" seriously i got to the DUBSTEP FORUMS and it is like blackout but blue instead of orange and the word "dubstep" replacing the word "techno".
it's quite absurd when you think about it..... saying "dubstep" is not a "musical movement" like "techno" etc is like saying French is not a language like English is a language.... just stupid, seperatist ideas that hold us all back. nobody is saying we should merge with psycho trance and donk etc but yea i think the social structure upon which we base the foundation for modern ideas has shown us, time and again that we as humans function better when we take a bit from here and a bit from there "cutting and pasting" the beneficial and avant gard bits from each "movement" in order to communicate more effectively...
dubstep was ace back in the early naughties, before anyone had even coined the phrase
guys like zed bias, oris j and others, even miss dynamite had an ill diss track out back then which was heavy
long before any bored techno producers jumped on the band wagon :;
Numeric
i gotta say lot's of "dusbtep" for me is fuking boring too..... i like PINCH for example but i can't stand QUAWALLI or whatever that tune is called..... the idea is not that "bored techno producers" like myself have "jumped on t he bandwagon" because that implies, at least in my case that i just grabbed up some typical bass drop sounds and went to town.... this is simply not so..... what happened in my case is that the "off beat" and "dark techno" people DEMANDED i keep making (even though it bores the pants off me), was so similar to the "dubstep" that was reaching other audiences, that not selling my music to those people as well just seemed STUPID to say the least. now i have more than doubled my fan base in 1 year and am able to experiment A LOT more with drums and low frequencies. i still allign myself with techno folks like STORMFIELD and SCORN but i no longer have to be afraid of being called a "surgeon clone" or a "shcranz" producer by ignorants... because i am making music that could be called "techno" could be called "dubstep" could be called "industrial breakstep" etc etc etc etc
on the other side of the coin "funky" is just like deep house but with off beat "dubstep" style garage drums, 2562 and martyn, two of the biggest names in "dubstep" are making what i would call retro detroit techno and the dubstep kids are eating it up!!! so are we saying that these guys "jumped on the techno bandwagon"? i would say that folks are finally waking up and realizing that dub, techno, garage, breakbeat etc etc etc is all basically the same thing and a good tune is a good tune so WHY WASTE TIME DEBATING ON WHICH GENRE CAME FIRST OR WILL LAST LONGER???? music is entertainment and art all at the same time, so have fun and blow minds!!!! that is all that really matters....
The law is not the private property of lawyers, nor is justice the exclusive province of judges and juries. In the final analysis, true justice is not a matter of courts and law books, but of a commitment in each of us to liberty and mutual respect. - Jimmy Carter
Yeah I hate categories, but infortunately the general public is used to being spoon-fed and needs things placed neatly in boxes.
IF I had my way things would go back to the early 90`s rave ethic, in club terms, and the music wouldn`t be the same genre all night.
A mix of dance music from DJ to DJ is great, as long as the music is good.
Hell, even playing lots of different sub genres as a DJ, in one set, how novel, rather than playing a bunch of similar sounding stuff of the same bpms all together.
I am not here but my ghost still lingers
sorry mate "dubstep" is still new to non-UK ears.... the energy to become bigger is now on a global scale, the uk may be saturated but spain, japan, brasil etc are just getting started and when all is said and done london is not the center of the world...."dubstep" is UK bass music that uses lot's of LFOs and low frequency manipulation to get it's point accross.... i would say that is a bit more advanced, production wise than the average "dark/hard techno" let's-trade-audio-loops-and-make-something-that-could-be-mistaken-for-a-90s-downwards-release mentality....... the idea is not to say "oh wow dubstep is the way forward" or "dubstep is an undiscovered gem" but to say ok, something has been happening musically called "dubstep", what can i learn from this "trend", what are the things that stay with me long after "dubstep" is gone? i mean i personally consider my newer works and that of bracket (RIP) and NOIZ etc to be TECHNO, but if the "dubstep" crowd "gets it" better.... there must be something behind that....
i remember when techno was a bunch of free thinkers trying to RACE forward to the next mind blowing, script flip of a tune, now it is like a bunch of retro cunts ignoring every new musical tendency and trying like hell to stay right where they are, on planet boring in the repitition galaxy just beyond the bury-your-head-in-the-sand-nebula haha
fuk techno. fuk dubstep. instead of following these "movements" we should be LEADING MOVEMENTS OF OUR OWN, not by inventing new genre names but by IGNORING THEM and experimenting as we always have, but without the fear of being labeled as one thing or another. let the distros, record stores and journalists worry about what is "techno" and what is "dubstep", that is their job!
let's get back to making music that is INTERESTING to the ears instead of atlking the music to death....